« Previous
Next »
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 9
, Pages 1203-1211
, September 2010
Intraoperative Comparison of Knee Laxity Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee and Contralateral Stable Knee Using Navigation System
References
- . ACL reconstruction: A meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:180–187
- . Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:791–803
- . Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:629–634
- . Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1675–1687
- A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:618–628
- . Future of double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: Incorporation of ACL anatomic data into the navigation system. Orthopedics. 2006;29(Suppl):S108–S112
- . Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel placement: A radiographic comparison between navigated versus manual ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2006;29(Suppl):S122–S124
- . Validation of computer-assisted double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics. 2007;30:S136–S140
- . Stability evaluation of single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction during navigated ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2008;16:77–83
- . Intraoperative biomechanical evaluation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a navigation system: Comparison of hamstring tendon and bone–patellar tendon–bone graft. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1903–1912
- . Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(Suppl 1):S49–S55
- Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:1015–1025
- . In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res. 1997;15:285–293
- . Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:660–666
- . Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of a lateral and an anatomic femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1825–1832
- . Intraoperative evaluation of the anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the OrthoPilot navigation system. Orthopedics. 2005;28:1277–1282
- . Three years of experience with computer navigation–assisted positioning of drilling tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament replacement. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(Suppl 1):e31–e32Available online at www.arthroscopyjournal.org
- . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using navigation: A comparative study on 60 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:542–552
- . Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Is the posterolateral bundle more important?. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:488–495
- . Description and validation of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of knee laxity. Comput Aided Surg. 2007;12:181–188
- Reliability of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of antero-posterior knee joint laxity. Comput Biol Med. 2009;39:280–285
- . Instrumented measurements of knee laxity: KT-1000 versus navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:617–621
- . Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft (Part I. Insertion of the graft and anterior-posterior testing). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1720–1727
- . Anterior-posterior and rotator stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:107–118
- . Anatomical two-bundle versus Rosenberg's isometric bi-socket ACL reconstruction: A biomechanical comparison in laxity match pretension. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:328–334
- . In vivo laxity of stable versus anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees using a navigation system: A comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:941–945
- . Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:464–472
- . Comparison of three techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: Differences in anterior tibial translation and tunnel enlargement with each technique. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:282–288
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Note: To access the videos accompanying this report, visit the September issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.
PII: S0749-8063(10)00038-1
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.002
© 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 9
, Pages 1203-1211
, September 2010


