Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 9, Supplement , Pages S21-S34, September 2010

Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

  • Kazunori Yasuda, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Kazunori Yasuda, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Sports Medicine & Joint Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Kita-15 Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
  • ,
  • Yoshie Tanabe, Ph.D., R.P.T.
  • ,
  • Eiji Kondo, M.D., Ph.D.
  • ,
  • Nobuto Kitamura, M.D., Ph.D.
  • ,
  • Harukazu Tohyama, M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Sports Medicine & Joint Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan

Received 16 February 2010; accepted 18 March 2010.

Abstract 

Several double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures were reported in the 1980s and 1990s. However, no significant differences were found in the clinical results between these double-bundle procedures and single-bundle procedures because the double-bundle procedures appeared to reconstruct only the anteromedial bundle with 2 bundles. In the early 2000s, we proposed a new concept of anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles, in which 4 independent tunnels were created through the center of each anatomic attachment of the 2 bundles. We called it “anatomic” double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Biomechanical studies have shown that the anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction can restore knee stability significantly more closely to the normal level than the conventional single-bundle reconstruction. Recent intraoperative measurement studies have shown that the clinically available anatomic double-bundle procedures can reconstruct knee stability significantly better and improve knee function close to the normal level at the time immediately after surgery compared with the conventional single-bundle procedures. However, the greatest criticism of the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction is whether its clinical results are better than the results of single-bundle reconstruction. To date (January 2010), 10 prospective comparative clinical trials (Level I or II) and 1 meta-analysis have been reported comparing single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle reconstructions using hamstring tendons. In 8 of the 10 studies, the anterior and/or rotatory stability of the knee was significantly better with the anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction than with the conventional single-bundle reconstruction. However, 1 original trial and the meta-analysis found that there were no differences in the results between the 2 types of reconstructions. Thus the utility of the anatomic double-bundle reconstruction has not yet been established. Our review does show how much evidence exists as to the benefits of double-bundle ACL reconstruction at present.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(10)00258-6

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.03.014

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 9, Supplement , Pages S21-S34, September 2010