Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 181-188, February 2001

The relationship between diagnosis and outcome in arthroscopy of the hip

Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Abstract 

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopy of the hip for osteonecrosis (ON) with those obtained for other diagnoses by presenting a cohort of patients with diagnosis and symptoms as dependant variables in a consecutive series of 86 cases of hip arthroscopy. Type of Study: Retrospective review of outcomes. Methods: There were 83 patients (86 hips) who underwent arthroscopy. Indications included ON (43%), labral injuries (20%), osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease, DJD) (10%), Legg-Calvé-Perthes (LCP) disease (10%), and loose bodies (10%). All but 2 patients had had symptoms for at least 6 months. Symptoms were pain (100%), mechanical problems (78%), and loss of motion (56%). Arthroscopy was performed in the supine position, using a standard traction table, 30° and/or 70°arthroscopes, and the anterior and peritrochanteric portals. Data were collected longitudinally, retrospectively reviewed, and statistically analyzed. Results: No complications were seen; 60% of the patients had significant improvement over an average follow-up of 30 months. Better results were with labral tears (91%, P < .003) or LCP disease (89%, P < .05). ON and DJD did worse with only 40% and 44% improvement, respectively. After free-vascularized fibular graft (FVFG), 34% of patients showed improvement at follow-up (P = .003). Eighteen patients (21%) underwent total hip arthroplasty at an average of 8.4 months after arthroscopy. Mechanical symptoms were a significant favorable prognostic factor (P = .0019), with 85% having a good result. Patients with ON and mechanical symptoms had a significantly lower conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty than those with only pain or pain and decreased range of motion (P = .0043). Conclusions: Arthroscopy of the hip is useful for diagnosis and therapy of loose bodies, labral injuries, focal chondral lesions, or the late sequellae of LCP disease. We conclude that the presence of mechanical symptoms is a favorable prognostic factor for any diagnosis except degenerative arthritis. Furthermore, the identification of mechanical symptoms is a specific indication for arthroscopy in ON before or after FVFG.

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 17, No 2 (February), 2001: pp 181–188

Keywords:  Hip, Arthroscopy, Osteonecrosis, Free-vascularized fibular graft

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Thomas Parker Vail, M.D., Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3332, Durham, NC 27710, U.S.A.

PII: S0749-8063(01)10333-6

doi:10.1053/jars.2001.21481

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 181-188, February 2001