Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages 88-95, February 2002

Complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Sacramento Knee and Sports Medicine, Sacramento, California (S.C.W.); Princeton Orthopedic Associates, Princeton, New Jersey (J.S.A.); and The Sports Clinic Orthopaedic Medical Associates, Laguna Hills, California (W.M.N.), U.S.A.

Abstract 

We review the literature on complication of arthroscopic shoulder surgery and their management. Computer data based searches were used to identify articles regarding complications of shoulder arthroscopy, as well as hand searches of Arthroscopy and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery over the last decade. Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has become a popular therapeutic and diagnostic procedure during the past two decades. As with all interventions complications can occur which require recognition and management by the orthopedic surgeon. While the literature is helpful with identifying types of complications, establishing the rate of these complications remains elusive. These complications can be divided into general complications, complications generic to all shoulder procedures, and complications specific to the type of procedure performed. General complications such as infection and anesthesia problems continue to show low incidences. Shoulder arthroscopy presents increased risk of complications over knee arthroscopy in regard to vascular and neurologic injury, fluid extravasation, stiffness, iatrogenic tendon injury, and equipment failure. New techniques of increased complexity for subacromial surgery, rotator cuff repair, and arthroscopic instability present new problems related to implant failure, nerve injury, iatrogenic fracture, and capsular necrosis. While the rate of complications especially with newer procedures remain elusive, most studies suggest that the rate is low, 5.8-9.5% in all recent review studies published. Underreporting complications makes assessment of incidence rates of complication difficult. Proper patient selection, attention to operative detail, and careful post-operative monitoring can minimize the morbidity associated with these complications.

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 18, No 2 (February, Suppl 1), 2002: pp 88–95

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Address correspondence to Stephen C. Weber, M.D., Sacramento Knee and Sports Medicine, 2801 K St. #310, Sacramento, CA 95816, U.S.A. E -mail: webersc@earthlink.net

PII: S0749-8063(02)70102-3

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 18, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages 88-95, February 2002