Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 200-203, February 2005

Panacryl synovitis: Fact or fiction?

  • Philippe Clavert, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Shoulder Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Jon J.P. Warner, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Shoulder Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Jon J. P. Warner, M.D., Harvard Shoulder Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 275 Cambridge St, Suite 403A, Boston, MA 02114, U.S.A.

Purpose: It has been suggested from anecdotal experience that Panacryl suture (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, Westwood, MA) may be responsible for an exaggerated inflammatory response. Our goal was to test the null hypothesis that Panacryl causes aseptic synovitis when used on anchors in the case of arthroscopic Bankart and rotator cuff repair. Type of Study: Retrospective review of the postoperative outcome, specifically looking for clinical criteria that are associated with aseptic synovitis. Methods: Eighty-three arthroscopic Bankart and 33 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed using anchors loaded with Panacryl. The clinical factors associated with synovitis that we assessed were motion, pain, hyperthermia, and swelling. Results: There was no hyperthermia. Two patients had transient swelling and 10 patients had initial transient postoperative pain. One patient had chronic pain and a second arthroscopy was performed 5 months after the initial procedure, which revealed obvious synovitis. Biopsy examinations were performed and these showed typical foreign-body reaction. Two anterior redislocations occurred after new traumas, 2 failed rotator cuff repairs were observed, due to early active motion, and 2 underwent an open revision repair; synovitis was not observed in any of these cases. After 6 months, the loss of external rotation was a mean of 6.7° (Bankart) and 3.3° (rotator cuff repair). The loss of forward elevation was a mean of 5.8° (Bankart) and of 3.3° (rotator cuff repair). Conclusions: In only 1 of 116 cases of arthroscopic repair was there direct evidence of synovitis. Even in the cases undergoing revision surgery, there was no indication that Panacryl caused aseptic synovitis. Clinical course after these repairs appeared to be similar to historical experience using nonabsorbable braided suture material. Failure rates in each series appeared to be more related to new trauma and use of other implants than to Panacryl suture. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Key words:  Foreign-body reaction , Panacryl , Shoulder instability , Rotator cuff tear , Retrospective study

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0749-8063(04)01228-9

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2004.10.015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 2 , Pages 200-203, February 2005