Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 6 , Pages 652-658, June 2005

Arthroscopic Versus Open Repair for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Meta-analysis

  • Nicholas G.H. Mohtadi, M.D. (F.R.C.S.C.)

      Affiliations

    • University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Nicholas G. H. Mohtadi, M.D., F.R.C.S.C., University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, 2500 University Dr N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • ,
  • Ivan J. Bitar, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina
  • ,
  • Treny M. Sasyniuk, B.P.E.

      Affiliations

    • University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Robert M. Hollinshead, M.D. (F.R.C.S.C.)

      Affiliations

    • University of Calgary Sport Medicine Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • ,
  • Wade P. Harper, M.B.B.S. (F.R.A.C.S.(Orth))

      Affiliations

    • Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the literature to determine whether open or arthroscopic surgical repair for traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability results in a better outcome. Type of Study: Meta-analysis. Methods: The search involved clinical studies in all languages in the MEDLINE database from 1966 to October 31, 2003. The following key words were used: (1) anterior shoulder instability, (2) Bankart lesion, (3) traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability, and (4) arthroscopic and open Bankart repair. All abstracts were reviewed and articles were included if there was a direct clinical comparison between arthroscopic and open repair for traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability. These articles were manually cross-referenced for additional abstracts. The final group of articles was independently critically appraised and the following outcomes were extracted: recurrent instability, return to activity, reoperation rate, and cause of recurrence. Results: The search terms resulted in 677, 183, 68, and 51 hits respectively. From these, 18 articles were determined to be eligible for full review including 2 foreign-language articles. Cross-referencing identified 2 unpublished studies. Eleven studies were included in the final analysis: 1 randomized trial, 2 pseudo-experimental designs, 4 prospective cohorts, 3 retrospective studies, and 1 case control study. Pooled Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio for recurrent instability and return to activity were 2.04 (P = .003; 95% confidence interval, 1.27, 3.29) and 2.85 (P = .004; 95% confidence interval, 1.40, 5.78), respectively, in favor of the open repair. Conclusions: Based on this meta-analysis, open repair has a more favorable outcome with respect to recurrence and return to activity. Level of Evidence: Level III, Systematic Review of Level III (and II/I) Studies.

Key Words:  Arthroscopic repair , Open repair , Recurrent traumatic shoulder instability

 

PII: S0749-8063(05)00274-4

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.02.021

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 6 , Pages 652-658, June 2005