Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 22, Issue 11 , Pages 1154-1158, November 2006

Triple-Loaded Single-Anchor Stitch Configurations: An Analysis of Cyclically Loaded Suture-Tendon Interface Security

  • David A. Coons, D.O.

      Affiliations

    • Plano Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center, Plano, Texas, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • F. Alan Barber, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Plano Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center, Plano, Texas, U.S.A.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to F. Alan Barber, M.D., Plano Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Center, 5228 West Plano Pkwy, Plano, TX 75093, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Morley A. Herbert, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Advanced Surgical Institutes, Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.

Purpose: This study evaluated the strength and suture-tendon interface security of different suture configurations from triple-suture–loaded anchors. Methods: A juvenile bovine infraspinatus tendon was detached and repaired by use of 4 different suture combinations from 2 suture anchors: 3 simple sutures in each anchor (ThreeVo anchor; Linvatec, Largo, FL); 2 peripheral simple stitches and 1 central horizontal mattress suture passed deeper into the tendon, creating a larger footprint (bigfoot-print anchor); 2 peripheral simple stitches with 1 central horizontal mattress stitch passed through the same holes as the simple sutures (stitch-of-Burns); and 2 simple stitches (TwoVo anchor; Linvatec). The constructs were cyclically loaded between 10 N and 180 N for 3,500 cycles and then destructively tested. The number of cycles required to create a 5-mm gap and a 10-mm gap and the ultimate load to failure and failure mode were recorded. Results: The ThreeVo anchor was strongest and most resistant to cyclic loading (P < .01). The TwoVo anchor was least resistant to cyclic loading. The stitch-of-Burns anchor was more resistant to cyclic loading than both the bigfoot-print anchor and the TwoVo anchor (P < .03). The ThreeVo, stitch-of-Burns, and TwoVo anchors were stronger than the bigfoot-print anchor (P < .05). Conclusions: Three simple sutures in an anchor hold better than two simple sutures. Three simple sutures provide superior suture-tendon security than combinations of one mattress and two simple stitches subjected to cyclic loading. A central mattress stitch placed more medially than two peripheral simple stitches (bigfoot-print anchor) configured to enlarge the tendon-suture footprint was not as resistant to cyclic loading or destructive testing as three simple stitches (ThreeVo anchor). Clinical Relevance: Placing a central mattress stitch more medially than 2 peripheral simple stitches to enlarge the tendon-suture footprint was not as resistant to cyclic loading or destructive testing as 3 simple stitches.

Key Words: Suture anchor, Rotator cuff, Tendon repair, Footprint, ThreeVo, TwoVo

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by a grant from Conmed, Largo, Florida.

PII: S0749-8063(06)00739-0

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.020

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 22, Issue 11 , Pages 1154-1158, November 2006