Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 291-298, March 2007

Observations on Bone Tunnel Enlargement After Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

  • Rainer Siebold, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Rainer Siebold, M.D., Department for Knee Surgery, ARCUS Sportklinik Pforzheim, Raststatter Strasse 17-19, 75179 Pforzheim, Germany.

Department for Knee Surgery, ARCUS Sportklinik Pforzheim, Pforzheim, Germany.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of tibial and femoral bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing primary double-bundle hamstring ACL reconstruction were included in a prospective case series. Femoral fixation was performed by means of 2 EndoButton CL devices (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA), and tibial fixation was done with 2 bioresorbable interference screws. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all patients at a mean of 12.3 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement was determined by digitally measuring the widths perpendicular to the long axis of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnels on an oblique coronal and axial plane. The MRI measurements were compared with the intraoperative drill diameter. Results: The mean tibial AM bone tunnel diameter increased from 0.74 to 1.06 cm, and the mean PL diameter increased from 0.60 to 0.89 cm. The mean femoral AM bone tunnel diameter increased from 0.71 to 0.97 cm, and the mean PL diameter increased from 0.58 to 0.85 cm. Bone tunnel enlargement was 43% (P = .001) for both tibial tunnels and 35% (P = .001) versus 48% (P < .001) for the femoral AM bone tunnel versus the PL femoral bone tunnel. On the tibial side, communication of the bone tunnels occurred in 41% of patients. Conclusions: This study shows significant tibial and femoral bone tunnel enlargement on MRI after 4-tunnel double-bundle ACL reconstruction 1 year postoperatively. In 41% of patients separate tibial bone tunnel measurements were impossible because of tunnel communication caused by intraoperative bone tunnel drilling, screw contact, or postoperative bone tunnel enlargement. On the femoral side, no bone tunnel communication occurred. The short-term clinical results were good and were not influenced by tunnel communication. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Key Words: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Double bundle, Anteromedial bundle, Posterolateral bundle, Hamstrings, Tunnel widening, Magnetic resonance imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The author reports no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(07)00049-7

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.006

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 291-298, March 2007