Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 670-673, June 2007

Clinical Evidence Shows No Difference Between Single- and Double-Row Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears

  • Daniel J. Reardon, B.Sc.(Hons), M.B.Ch.B.
  • ,
  • Nicola Maffulli, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.(Orth)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Nicola Maffulli, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.(Orth), Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Keele University School of Medicine, North Staffordshire Hospital, Thornburrow Drive, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, England.

Abstract 

Tears of the rotator cuff may be repaired by single- or double-row techniques. Single-row methods do not restore the rotator cuff footprint but do provide a good functional outcome. We surveyed the literature to ascertain the origin of the current trend of using double-row methods of repair. The footprint repair is a benefit of double-row fixation with strong evidence of its biomechanical success. However, the functional outcome of double-row fixation is equivalent to single-row fixation. Given the lack of scientific evidence and despite the enthusiasm of surgeons for this new technique, single-row fixation remains an acceptable method for managing these injuries, and it is our opinion that it is the preferable method.

Key Words: Rotator cuff, Single-row repair, Double-row repair, Footprint, Arthroscopic repair, Shoulder

 

PII: S0749-8063(07)00243-5

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.031

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 670-673, June 2007