Journal Home
Search for

Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 670-673 (June 2007)


View previous. 20 of 32 View next.

Clinical Evidence Shows No Difference Between Single- and Double-Row Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears

Daniel J. Reardon, B.Sc.(Hons), M.B.Ch.B., Nicola Maffulli, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.(Orth)Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Abstract 

Tears of the rotator cuff may be repaired by single- or double-row techniques. Single-row methods do not restore the rotator cuff footprint but do provide a good functional outcome. We surveyed the literature to ascertain the origin of the current trend of using double-row methods of repair. The footprint repair is a benefit of double-row fixation with strong evidence of its biomechanical success. However, the functional outcome of double-row fixation is equivalent to single-row fixation. Given the lack of scientific evidence and despite the enthusiasm of surgeons for this new technique, single-row fixation remains an acceptable method for managing these injuries, and it is our opinion that it is the preferable method.

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Keele University School of Medicine, North Staffordshire Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, England.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Nicola Maffulli, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., F.R.C.S.(Orth), Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Keele University School of Medicine, North Staffordshire Hospital, Thornburrow Drive, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 7QB, England.

PII: S0749-8063(07)00243-5

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.031


View previous. 20 of 32 View next.