Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 23, Issue 12 , Pages 1309-1319.e1, December 2007

The Influence of Femoral Technique for Graft Placement on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Skeletally Immature Canine Model With a Rapidly Growing Physis

  • Steven Chudik, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hinsdale Orthopaedic Associates, Hinsdale, Illinois, U.S.A.
    • Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Steven Chudik, M.D., Hinsdale Orthopaedics, 550 W Ogden, Hinsdale, IL 60521, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Leslie Beasley, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Denver Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Hollis Potter, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
    • Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Thomas Wickiewicz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
    • Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Russell Warren, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
    • Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Scott Rodeo, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
    • Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 3 different femoral techniques of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a skeletally immature canine model. Methods: A soft-tissue autograft ACL reconstruction was performed in 25 ten-week-old canines via a central transphyseal tibial tunnel and 1 of 3 femoral techniques: epiphyseal, over the top, or transphyseal. The contralateral hind limbs served as controls. The canines were killed at 16 weeks postoperatively and evaluated by gross inspection, plain radiographs, photography, magnetic resonance imaging, and histomorphometry. Results: There were no significant differences in femoral longitudinal growth; however, tibial growth was significantly greater on the experimental side relative to controls (P = .001). Angular and rotational deformities were noted on the femoral side but not on the tibial side. The epiphyseal technique resulted in less angular deformity and most closely maintained the anatomic position of the ACL graft with growth; however, this technique exhibited increased femoral rotational deformity. All techniques exhibited a high rate of graft failure. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed chondral and subchondral injuries to the lateral femoral condyle, most frequently in the epiphyseal group. Conclusions: From the results of our study, we cannot advocate any single femoral reconstructive technique. An epiphyseal femoral technique may reduce the risk of angular deformity and allow a more optimal femoral graft position after growth as opposed to transphyseal and over-the-top techniques. However, the epiphyseal technique may possess an increased risk for rotational deformity, physeal injury, and articular surface injury. Metaphyseal fixation of ACL grafts traversing rapidly growing physes may be responsible for the observed abnormalities in graft integrity, femoral graft position, and femoral angulation and rotation. Clinical Relevance: ACL reconstruction in the skeletally immature individual is complicated by the presence of active physeal and epiphyseal cartilage surrounding the growing knee, the pathophysiologic consequences of injury to these developing structures, and the final effect on the anatomy and function of the graft, bone, and articular surface. Animal models can provide insight and direction as we develop and evaluate our treatment methods for this clinical problem, but these animal models have anatomic and physiologic differences that limit direct comparison to humans.

Key Words: Anterior cruciate ligament, Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Skeletally immature, Epiphyseal tunnel, Physis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 

Note: To access the supplementary Fig 1 accompanying this report, visit the December issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org

 Supported by funding from the Institute for Sports Medicine Research at the Hospital for Special Surgery. The authors report no conflict of interest. Research was performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery.

PII: S0749-8063(07)00688-3

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.006

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 23, Issue 12 , Pages 1309-1319.e1, December 2007