Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 70-77, January 2009

Comparison of Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon–Bone Autografts

  • Sung-Jae Kim, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Seung-Bae Jo, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • ,
  • Praveen Kumar, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics, Lisie Hospital, Kochi, India
  • ,
  • Kyung-Soo Oh, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Kyung-Soo Oh, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, C.P.O. Box 8044, 134, Shinchon-Dong, Seodaemun-Ku, 120-752, Seoul, Korea

Received 22 May 2008; accepted 5 September 2008.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare postoperative knee stability and functional scores between single- and double- bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with the use of quadriceps tendon–bone autografts at a 2-year follow-up.

Methods

The records of 59 patients who had ACL reconstruction between January 2005 and April 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-eight patients had single-bundle reconstruction (group S) and 31 received double-bundle reconstruction (group D). Ligament stability was assessed with the Lachman and pivot-shift tests and a KT-2000 arthrometer. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores were employed to evaluate the functional outcomes.

Results

The postoperative mean side-to-side difference for group S was 2.64 mm and 1.79 mm for group D, a difference that was found to be statistically significant (P = .020). Regarding the pivot-shift test, 3 patients had grade 1+ and 1 patient had grade 2+ pivot-shift in group S, while no patients had abnormal pivot-shift in group D (P = .093). The patients who reported grade A or B on IKDC scores were 24 and 28 in group S and D, respectively (P > .1). On the questionnaire of the twisting activity, although statistical difference was not found between the groups, there was a trend toward more restriction in twisting activity in group S (P = .096). We found significant correlation between the twisting activity and instability questionnaire of the Lysholm score (Spearman coefficient, 0.737; P < .001).

Conclusions

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon–bone autografts provide less laxity (1.79 mm) than single-bundle ACL reconstruction (2.64 mm) as measured by the KT-2000. However, we could not find any significant differences in the functional measurements between the 2 groups.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Key Words: Anterior cruciate ligament, Double-bundle reconstruction, Functional outcomes, Knee stability, Quadriceps tendon–bone autograft

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(08)00687-7

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.004

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 70-77, January 2009