Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 274-281, March 2009

A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Techniques of Footprint Reconstruction for Rotator Cuff Repair: The SwiveLock-FiberChain Construct Versus Standard Double-Row Repair

  • Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., 400 Concord Plaza Dr, Suite 300, San Antonio, TX 78216, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Christopher R. Adams, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Sarah S. Burkhart, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • John D. Schoolfield, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.

Received 28 February 2008; accepted 27 September 2008. published online 19 December 2008.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical fixation parameters of a standard double-row rotator cuff repair with those of a knotless footprint reconstruction using the double-row SwiveLock-FiberChain technique (Arthrex, Naples, FL).

Methods

Seven matched pairs of human cadaveric shoulders were used for testing (mean age, 48 ± 10.3 years). A shoulder from each matched pair was randomly selected to receive a standard 4-anchor double-row repair of the supraspinatus tendon, and the contralateral shoulder received a 4-anchor double-row SwiveLock-FiberChain repair. The tendon was cycled from 10 N to 100 N at 1 Hz for 500 cycles, followed by a single-cycle pull to failure at 33 mm/s. Yield load, ultimate load, cyclic displacement, and mode of failure were recorded.

Results

Yield load and ultimate load were higher for the SwiveLock-FiberChain repair compared with the standard double-row repair for 6 of the 7 treatment pairs; however, 1 cadaver had a contrary outcome, so the overall mean differences in yield load and ultimate load were not significantly different from 0 by Student t test (P > .15). Furthermore, smaller differences between yield load and ultimate load for the SwiveLock-FiberChain repair in 5 of the 7 treatment pairs showed a self-reinforcing mechanism.

Conclusions

Double-row footprint reconstruction with the knotless SwiveLock-FiberChain system in this study had yield loads, ultimate loads, and cyclic displacements that were statistically equivalent to those of standard double-row rotation cuff reconstructions.

Clinical Relevance

The SwiveLock-FiberChain system's combination of strength, self-reinforcement, and decreased operating time may offer advantages to the surgeon, particularly when dealing with older patients in whom poor tissue quality and total operative time are important considerations.

Key Words: Biomechanical testing, Rotator cuff, Self-reinforcement, Knotless rotator cuff repair, Rotator cuff repair

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by Arthrex, Naples, Florida. S.S.B. receives royalties from Arthrex related to the subject of this research. Research performed at Arthrex Biomechanics Laboratory, Naples, Florida.

PII: S0749-8063(08)00762-7

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.024

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 274-281, March 2009