Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 563-564, May 2009
Author's Reply
Article Outline
Dear Dr. Shneider,
Thank you for your interest in the technical note “Anteromedial Portal Technique for the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Socket: Pitfalls and Solutions.”1 I respect the fact that you have had 25 years' experience with the technique. While you are not the first to remind readers and me that, in addition to the options of ACL femoral cortical suspensory button fixation and ACL femoral interference screw fixation, the ACL femoral Transfix Pin (Arthrex, Naples, FL) is an alternative method for graft fixation,2 I thank you for this reminder.
I have no experience with freehand technique for ACL femoral or tibial tunnel preparation. Because accurate tunnel placement is vital to ACL reconstruction outcome,3 my preferred technique is guided tunnel placement. It is possible that transtibial drilling may result in poor femoral socket position; however, based on his legendary reputation, I don't imagine that Tom Rosenberg achieved poor socket position frequently. Current research suggests that attention to reproducible landmarks during transtibial drilling may result in a well-positioned graft.4
You offer interesting and speculative logic with regard to the development of the growing interest in double-bundle ACL reconstruction. This was not the purpose of my technical note, but there has been speculation on this topic recently published.5
You conclude that, because of the challenges of transtibial drilling, I should consider a change to AM portal drilling. Here, it sounds as if we are on the same page. The purpose of my article was to consider exactly that change. Perhaps though, in addition, you are suggesting I should consider a change to the ACL femoral Transfix Pin technique. In the context of all the recent and technically challenging changes in ACL technique that I have considered,1, 6, 7 I allow that your idea of my switching to ACL femoral Transfix Pin technique is daunting. However, based on your experience, I will respectfully consider your recommendation. Thank you again.
Sincerely,
References
- . Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: Pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:95–101
- . An alternative method for “all-inside” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:451;(letter).
- . Practical considerations in anterior cruciate ligament replacement surgery. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:715–724
- . A reproducible landmark for the tibial tunnel origin in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Avoiding a vertical graft in the coronal plane. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:843–845
- . Techniques in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: As simple as ABC, or putting the cart before the horse?. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1089–1091
- . No-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the transtibial all-inside technique. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:900.e1–900.e11
- . No tunnel 2-socket technique: All-inside anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle retroconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1184–1189
PII: S0749-8063(09)00141-8
doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.015
© 2009 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- The Anterior Medial Portal
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 563-564, May 2009


