Volume 25, Issue 12 , Pages 1478-1490, December 2009
Evidence-Based Indications for Ankle Arthroscopy
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to review the literature to provide a comprehensive description of the Level of Evidence available to support the surgical technique of ankle arthroscopy for the current generally accepted indications and assign a grade of recommendation for each of them.
Methods
A comprehensive review of the literature was performed (in August 2008) by use of the PubMed database. The abstracts from these searches were reviewed to isolate literature that described therapeutic studies investigating the results of different ankle arthroscopic treatment techniques. All articles were reviewed and assigned a classification (I-IV) of Level of Evidence. An analysis of the literature reviewed was used to assign a grade of recommendation for each current generally accepted indication for ankle arthroscopy.
Results
There exists fair evidence-based literature (grade B) to support a recommendation for the use of ankle arthroscopy for the treatment of ankle impingement and osteochondral lesions and for ankle arthrodesis. Ankle arthroscopy for ankle instability, septic arthritis, arthrofibrosis, and removal of loose bodies is supported with only poor-quality evidence (grade C). Treatment of ankle arthritis, excluding isolated bony impingement, is not effective and therefore this indication is not recommended (grade C against). Finally, there is insufficient evidence-based literature to support or refute the benefit of arthroscopy for the management of synovitis and fractures (grade I).
Conclusions
There exists adequate evidence-based literature to support the surgical technique of ankle arthroscopy for most current generally accepted indications; however, further studies in this area are needed.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, systematic review.
Key Words: Ankle joint, Arthroscopy, Systematic review, Level of Evidence, Grade of recommendation
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Smith & Nephew.
PII: S0749-8063(09)00418-6
doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.001
Crown Copyright © 2009. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 25, Issue 12 , Pages 1478-1490, December 2009


