Volume 25, Issue 12 , Pages 1374-1379, December 2009
The Passive Distraction Test: A New Diagnostic Aid for Clinically Significant Superior Labral Pathology
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to present a new provocative maneuver, the passive distraction test (PDT), as an examination tool to be used in the evaluation of patients thought to have a SLAP lesion and to compare its accuracy, precision, and reproducibility alone and in conjunction with previously published maneuvers.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of 319 consecutive arthroscopies performed between May 2001 and November 2003 was performed. A total of 65 cases were excluded, 53 because of limitation of elevation to less than 150° or pain in the starting test position and 12 who had previous shoulder procedures performed by the senior author, leaving 254 cases for review. A thorough history was obtained and a thorough physical examination performed with a focus on the involved shoulder including specific provocative maneuvers for the clinical diagnosis of a SLAP lesion. The active compression test, the anterior slide test, and the PDT were used to clinically diagnose a SLAP lesion. The results from the 3 provocative maneuvers were compared with the arthroscopic findings to determine the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value of each test alone and in a logical combination.
Results
Of 254 shoulder arthroscopies, 61 had a clinically significant SLAP lesion, for an incidence of 24%. The sensitivity and specificity for the PDT were 53% and 94%, respectively, with an NPV of 87% and positive predictive value of 72%. In combination, the PDT and the active compression test yielded an NPV of 90.5%.
Conclusions
The PDT can be used alone or in combination to aid in the clinical evaluation and diagnosis of a SLAP lesion.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, retrospective, diagnostic, sensitivity-specificity study.
Key Words: Passive distraction test, Superior labrum anterior-posterior lesion, SLAP, Physical examination
To access this article, please choose from the options below
The authors report no conflict of interest.
PII: S0749-8063(09)00419-8
doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.04.070
© 2009 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 25, Issue 12 , Pages 1374-1379, December 2009


