Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 25, Issue 10 , Pages 1101-1107, October 2009

Comparison of Different Sizes of Bioabsorbable Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Bead Augmentation in a Porcine Model

  • Pei-Hung Shen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • ,
  • Shiu-Bii Lien, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • ,
  • Hsain-Chung Shen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • ,
  • Chih-Chien Wang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • ,
  • Guo-Shu Huang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • ,
  • Kuo-Hua Chao, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • ,
  • Chian-Her Lee, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    • Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Chian-Her Lee, M.D., Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, 252 Wu Hsing Street, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
  • ,
  • Leou-Chyr Lin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

Received 25 March 2008; accepted 22 May 2009.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the initial fixation strength of tendon grafts between different sizes of bioabsorbable interference screws (BioScrew; Linvatec, Largo, FL) with bioabsorbable bead (EndoPearl; Linvatec) augmentation through biomechanical analysis of a porcine femoral bone model.

Methods

Forty pairs of porcine femurs and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were divided into control and study groups. In the control group 8 × 30–mm BioScrews alone (n = 10) were inserted, whereas different sizes of BioScrews, measuring 7 × 30 mm (n = 10), 8 × 30 mm (n = 10), and 9 × 30 mm (n = 10), with 8–mm EndoPearl augmentation were inserted individually for fixation of tendon grafts in the study groups. All specimens were cyclically loaded with axial forces between 50 and 250 N at 1 Hz for 3,000 cycles and then incrementally loaded to failure at a rate of 150 mm/min.

Results

BioScrews with EndoPearl augmentation had a significantly higher failure load than BioScrews alone (8–mm BioScrew alone v 8–mm BioScrew and EndoPearl, P < .05). There were no significant differences in the ultimate failure load (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .201 and P = .871, respectively), stiffness (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .789 and P = .823, respectively), displacement (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .695 and P = .781, respectively), and bone mineral density (P = .728 for all comparisons) except insertion torque (8 mm v 7 mm and 9 mm, P = .045 and P = .518, respectively) between study groups. Less tendon laceration by the screw thread was noted in the group in which smaller-sized BioScrews were used.

Conclusions

When EndoPearl augmentation was used, smaller-sized BioScrews (BioScrew size 1 mm smaller than bone tunnel) offered equivalent graft fixation strength to BioScrews of similar or larger sizes.

Clinical Relevance

Smaller-sized BioScrews can be chosen if EndoPearl augmentation has been used, and EndoPearl augmentation may reduce the risk of tendon rupture while BioScrews are inserted.

Key Words: Bioabsorbable bead, Anterior cruciate ligament, Graft fixation

 

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(09)00502-7

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.05.011

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 25, Issue 10 , Pages 1101-1107, October 2009