Journal Home
Search for

Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1387-1390 (December 2009)


View previous. 13 of 30 View next.

Anatomic Relation of Dorsal Wrist Arthroscopy Portals and Superficial Nerves: A Cadaveric Study

Marios Tryfonidis, M.R.C.S.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Charalambos P. Charalambous, M.Sc., F.R.C.S.(Tr&Orth)b, Greta K. Jass, M.R.C.S.a, Samuel Jacob, Ph.D.a, Mike J. Hayton, F.R.C.S.(Tr&Orth)b, John K. Stanley, F.R.C.Sb

Received 16 November 2008; accepted 10 June 2009. published online 09 November 2009.

Purpose

The aim of this cadaveric study was to assess and compare the distance of commonly used dorsal wrist portals to the dorsal ulnar and radial superficial nerves and their branches.

Methods

Twenty embalmed cadaveric upper limbs were dissected, exposing the nerves and tendons, and wrist arthroscopy portal sites were marked with pins. The horizontal distance between the portals and closest nerve branch was measured with a digital caliper. Statistical analysis of the data was performed with SPSS software for Windows (version 11.5; SPSS, Chicago, IL) by use of Friedman tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Results

The median distance of the nearest nerve branch to portal 1-2 was 1.82 mm; portal 3-4, 4.85 mm; portal 4-5, 16.13 mm; portal 6U, 2.47 mm; and midcarpal radial portal (MCP), 6.65 mm. The 4-5 portal was safer than the 1-2 portal (P < .0001), 3-4 portal (P = .015), MCP (P = .001), and 6U portal (P < .0001). The MCP was safer than the 1-2 portal (P = .01), 3-4 portal (P = .019), and 6U portal (P = .003).

Conclusions

The 4-5 portal is further away from a nerve branch than any other portal, followed by the MCP.

Clinical Relevance

The results of this study may be of use in the planning of wrist arthroscopy.

a Department of Anatomy, Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, England

b Department of Upper Limb Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, England

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to M. Tryfonidis, M.R.C.S., 133 Wulfric Rd, Sheffield S2 1DZ, England

 Research was performed at University of Sheffield. The authors report no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(09)00517-9

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.005


View previous. 13 of 30 View next.