False FHL: A Normal Variant Posing Risks in Posterior Hindfoot Endoscopy

References 

1. van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R. A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:871–876
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (2254 KB)
   • CrossRef
2. Niek van Dijk C, van Bergen CJ. Advancements in ankle arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:635–646
3. van Dijk CN. Hindfoot endoscopy for posterior ankle pain. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:545–554
   • MEDLINE
4. Amendola A, Lee KB, Saltzman CL, Suh JS. Technique and early experience with posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:298–302
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Lee KB, Saltzman CL, Suh JS, Wasserman L, Amendola A. A posterior 3-portal arthroscopic approach for isolated subtalar arthrodesis. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1306–1310
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (3843 KB)
   • CrossRef
6. Sarrafian S. Myology. In: Anatomy of the foot and ankle: Descriptive, topographic, functional. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1993;p. 218–282
7. Mellado JM, Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Colon E. The peroneocalcaneus internus muscle: MR imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:585–588
8. Seipel R, Linklater J, Pitsis G, Sullivan M. The peroneocalcaneus internus muscle: An unusual cause of posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:890–893
   • MEDLINE
9. Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Sommer C. Foot movement and tendon excursion: An in vitro study. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:386–395
   • MEDLINE