Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 494-499, April 2010

Diagnostic Ultrasound Evaluation of Posterolateral Corner Knee Injuries

  • Jon K. Sekiya, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • MedSport, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Jon K. Sekiya, M.D., MedSport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr, PO Box 0391, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-0391, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Jennifer C. Swaringen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Orthopaedic Associates of West Florida, Clearwater, Florida, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Edward M. Wojtys, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • MedSport, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • ,
  • Jon A. Jacobson, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Received 8 January 2009; accepted 30 August 2009. published online 12 February 2010.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine whether dynamic ultrasound (US) would be able to differentiate posterolateral corner knee injuries that would require surgical intervention.

Methods

This is a single-group cohort study. A knee sonogram was obtained in patients referred to us with suspected posterolateral knee injury. In addition to static US imaging, a dynamic US stress test was performed by placement of maximum varus stress on the knee at 30° of flexion. The tibiofemoral separation was then measured with US. Results from US and surgery were then compared.

Results

Sixteen patients had US and underwent surgery, and twelve patients had surgical findings requiring surgical intervention to the posterolateral knee structures. With regard to static US images, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy were 92%, 75%, 92%, 75%, and 88%, respectively, for the lateral collateral ligament; 33%, 100%, 100%, 33%, and 50%, respectively, for the popliteus; and 67%, 75%, 67%, 75%, and 69%, respectively, for the popliteofibular ligament. The dynamic US stress test showing 10.5 mm of lateral joint space width or more during varus stress showed a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 100% for injury to the lateral collateral ligament and posterolateral corner structures, with a positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 75%, and accuracy of 88%.

Conclusions

A positive dynamic US stress test (≥10.5 mm) positively predicted the need for posterolateral knee surgery in 100% of patients in this study who required posterolateral corner repair or reconstruction.

Level of Evidence

Level I, testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria in series of consecutive patients with universally applied gold standard.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(09)00782-8

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.023

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 4 , Pages 494-499, April 2010