« Previous
Next »
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 10
, Pages 1273-1280
, October 2010
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Aged 70 Years or Older
References
- . The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans. 1986;10:228
- . Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;70–77
- . Rotator cuff repair: Relevance of patient age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:95–100
- . Rupture of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1962;44:979–983
- . Full-thickness rotator cuff tear prevalence and correlation with function and co-morbidities in patients 65 years and older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:881–885
- . Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults (The effect of age, hand dominance, and gender). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:296–298
- . Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:10–15
- . Management of rotator cuff tears: A comparison of arthroscopic debridement and surgical repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:70–78
- . Massive rotator cuff tears: Debridement versus repair. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:117–124
- . Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty versus mini-open repair in the management of significant partial thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:79–82
- . Aging of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. 1979;7:102–110
- . Rotator cuff repairs in patients 62 years of age or older. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:97–99
- . Repair of massive rotator cuff tears in patients older than 70 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:26–30
- . A new technique for regional anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery based on a suprascapular nerve block and an axillary nerve block: An evaluation of the first results. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:689–696
- . Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures (Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;78–83
- . Prospective longitudinal analysis of postoperative shoulder function: A ten-year follow-up study of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1052–1056
- . Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales (Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery). Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:214–221
- . Operative treatment of failed repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1505–1515
- . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:579–585
- . Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:563–567
- . Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: 2- to 14-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:136–144
- . Normalization of the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:279–285
- . A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;160–164
- . The Constant score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:128–133
- . Management of patients with massive rotator cuff defects by acromioplasty and rotator cuff debridement. Orthop Trans. 1986;10:622
- . Massive irreparable tears of the rotator cuff: Results of operative debridement and subacromial decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:715–721
- . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients older than 60 years. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:48–54
- . Open repair of massive rotator cuff tears in patients aged sixty-five years or over: Is it worthwhile?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;13:517–521
- . Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:124–128
- . All-arthroscopic versus mini-open cuff repair: A long term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:234–238
- . Surgical repair of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: Factors influencing the result. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:14–26
- Hawkins RJ, Misamore GW, Hobeika PE. Surgery for full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 198;67:1349-1355.
One or more of the authors has declared a potential conflict of interest: A.A.R. has received research or institutional support, miscellaneous funding, and royalties or is a consultant or employee of Arthrex; N.N.V. has received research or institutional support and is a consultant or employee of Smith & Nephew; B.J.C. has received research or institutional support and royalties and is a consultant or employee of Arthrex, has received research or institutional support or miscellaneous funding and is a consultant or employee of Genzyme, and has received research or institutional support and is a consultant or employee of Zimmer; G.P.N. has received research or institutional support from EBI, has received royalties and stock options and is a consultant or employee of Zimmer, and has received royalties from Innomed. N.N.V., B.J.C., G.P.N., and A.A.R. have received institutional support from Arthrex, DJ Orthopaedics, Ossur, Smith & Nephew, Miomed, Athletico, and Linvatec.
PII: S0749-8063(10)00144-1
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.031
© 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 10
, Pages 1273-1280
, October 2010


