Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 10 , Pages 1357-1362, October 2010

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Length: Cadaveric Analysis Comparing Anteromedial Portal Versus Outside-In Technique

  • James H. Lubowitz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Taos Orthopaedic Institute Research Foundation, Taos, New Mexico, U.S.A.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to James H. Lubowitz, M.D., Taos Orthopaedic Institute Research Foundation, 1219-A Gusdorf Rd, Taos, NM 87571, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • John Konicek, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research and Bioengineering, Arthrex, Inc., Naples, Florida, U.S.A.

Received 23 July 2009; accepted 12 February 2010.

Purpose

The purpose was to measure anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel lengths comparing anteromedial (AM) portal and outside-in techniques.

Methods

ACL femoral guide pins were drilled into 12 cadaveric knees through the AM portal technique and then the outside-in technique in each specimen. Pin intraosseous distance was measured in millimeters by a MicroScribe 3-dimensional digitizer (Immersion, San Jose, CA).

Results

With the AM portal technique, the mean ACL femoral tunnel distance was 30.5 mm. With the outside-in technique, the mean ACL femoral tunnel distance was 34.1 mm. The difference was statistically significant (P = .04).

Conclusions

Our results show that the outside-in technique for creating the ACL femoral tunnel results in a longer mean tunnel length than the AM portal technique for creating the ACL femoral tunnel. The outside-in technique best prevents excessively short tunnels.

Clinical Relevance

Our results have clinical relevance for surgeons who desire to perform independent, rather than transtibial, drilling of the ACL femoral tunnel and desire adequate length of tendon graft within the femoral bone tunnel.

 

 The authors have a consultant/royalties relationship (J.H.L.) and an employee relationship (J.K.) with Arthrex.

 

Note: To access the video accompanying this report, visit the October issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.

PII: S0749-8063(10)00183-0

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.014

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 10 , Pages 1357-1362, October 2010