Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 10 , Pages 1333-1339, October 2010

An Analysis of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Isometric Position Using an In Vivo 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography–Based Knee Joint Model

Presented at the 2009 Congress of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Keystone, Colorado, July 2009.

  • Woon-Seob Jeong, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Yon-Sik Yoo, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Yon-Sik Yoo, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Gyodong 153, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Do-Young Kim, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Nagraj S. Shetty, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
  • ,
  • Patrick Smolinski, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Kartik Logishetty, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Anil Ranawat, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Received 1 August 2009; accepted 12 February 2010. published online 17 May 2010.

Purpose

This study aimed to review the isometric point of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) based on insertional locations identified in recent anatomic studies by use of a 3-dimensional knee model.

Methods

Ten living subjects with healthy knees were evaluated. High-resolution computed tomography scans were performed at 3 positions of 0°, 90°, and 135°, and 3-dimensional knee images were constructed. Customized software was used to define tibial and femoral insertion points of the PCL, based on recently described anatomy. The femoral attachment site of the PCL was divided into 4 sectors (labeled A through D), and the tibial attachment site was divided into 6 sectors (labeled 1 through 6). Twenty-four virtual PCL bundles were created between these sectors, and their length was measured in the 3 knee flexion positions.

Results

In 0° and 90° of knee flexion, the virtual bundle showing the least amount of length change (1.10 ± 0.66 mm) was at sector D-6, that is, a posteromedial bundle inserting into the most posterior femoral sector (sector D) and the most distal tibial sector (sector 6). This change was not significantly different compared with all other virtual bundles with tibial points connected to femoral sector D (P > .05). An isometric position for the PCL (length change <2 mm) could not be found in 135° of knee flexion because of lengthening of all virtual bundles.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the femoral attachment point is more important than the tibial attachment point: any of the 6 tibial bundles attached to the most posterior femoral sector had similar isometric properties.

Clinical Relevance

Reproducing normal tibial and femoral anatomy underpins PCL surgical reconstruction. These findings suggest that to perform an isometrically accurate PCL reconstruction, particular attention should be paid to the location of the femoral attachment site, once the tibial footprint has been established. There were no isometric points in any virtual PCL bundle in the fully flexed knee because of excessive lengthening. Therefore, to avoid lengthening of the reconstructed graft, we recommend that fixation is performed at knee flexion angles between 0° and 90° and that patients avoid high flexion during postoperative rehabilitation.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(10)00185-4

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.016

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 26, Issue 10 , Pages 1333-1339, October 2010