Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 5 , Pages 653-665, May 2011

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon: A Prospective Comparative Study With 9-Year Follow-Up

  • Benjamin Wipfler, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Knee and Foot Surgery, Sports Traumatology, ATOS Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Stefanie Donner, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • St. Josefs Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • ,
  • Christian M. Zechmann, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Jan Springer, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Knee and Foot Surgery, Sports Traumatology, ATOS Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Rainer Siebold, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Knee and Foot Surgery, Sports Traumatology, ATOS Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Hans Heinrich Paessler, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Knee and Foot Surgery, Sports Traumatology, ATOS Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Hans Heinrich Paessler, M.D., Bismarckstrasse 9-15, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany

Received 19 January 2010; accepted 13 January 2011.

Purpose

To analyze the long-term evaluation of clinical, functional, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results after implant-free press-fit anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone–patella tendon (BPT) versus quadrupled hamstring tendon (HT) grafts.

Methods

Sixty-two ACL-insufficient patients were included in a prospective, randomized study (31 BPT and 31 HT). Both surgical procedures were performed without any implants by a press-fit technique by the senior author. The femoral tunnel was drilled through the anteromedial portal for anatomic placement. At 8.8 years after reconstruction, 53 patients (28 BPT and 25 HT) were examined by different clinical and functional tests. Bilateral MRI scans were performed and interpreted by an independent radiologist.

Results

On follow-up, the score on the International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation form was significantly better in the HT group. The clinical examination including range of motion, KT-1000 test (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), and pivot-shift test showed no significant differences. On isokinetic testing, the mean quadriceps strength was close to normal (96%) in both groups, but the hamstring strength was lower in the HT group (100.3%/95.1%). Kneeling (1.5/1.1, P = .002), knee walking (1.72/1.14, P = .002), and single-leg hop test (95.8%/99.1%, P = .057) were better in the HT group. The MRI findings about the mean degree of cartilage lesion (International Cartilage Repair Society protocol) of the operated (2.1/2.1) and nonoperated (1.4/1.8) knee showed no significant differences. No significant difference was found in the grade of medial or lateral meniscal lesion or the number of patients having meniscal lesions when the operated and nonoperated knees were compared. Tunnel measurements, Caton-Deschamps Index, and the sagittal ACL angle were similar.

Conclusions

The implant-free press-fit technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by use of bone–patellar tendon and hamstring grafts with anatomic graft placement is an innovative technique to preserve the cartilage and meniscal status without significant differences between the operated and nonoperated knees in the long term. Significantly less anterior knee pain was noted in the hamstring group, when testing for kneeling and knee walking.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prospective comparative study.

 

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

 

Note: To access the videos accompanying this report, visit the May issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.

PII: S0749-8063(11)00085-5

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 5 , Pages 653-665, May 2011