Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 8 , Pages 1079-1089, August 2011

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Remnant Preservation and a Femoral Tensioning Technique: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results

  • Jin Hwan Ahn, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Joon Ho Wang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Yong Seuk Lee, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gachon University School of Medicine, Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea
  • ,
  • Jae Gyoon Kim, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Jun Hee Kang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Kyoung Hwan Koh, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Kyoung Hwan Koh, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 135-710, South Korea

Received 20 May 2010; accepted 2 March 2011. published online 27 June 2011.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with autogenous hamstring tendon by use of remnant preservation and a femoral tensioning technique.

Methods

A total of 53 patients who had ACL reconstruction by use of remnant ACL stump preservation and a femoral tensioning technique were evaluated. Clinical evaluation at a minimum of 2 years after surgery included range of motion, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, KT-2000 arthrometer testing (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), and clinical scores. Plain radiographs were evaluated for tunnel enlargement. MRI was obtained for evaluation of graft continuity, cyclops-like mass lesion, and positioning of the tibial tunnel. Second-look arthroscopy was performed in 33 patients.

Results

The clinical scores improved postoperatively. There were statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative Lachman tests, pivot-shift tests, and KT-2000 arthrometer measurements. Postoperative MRI was available in 48 patients, and it showed intact graft in 45 patients, 2 partial tears, and 1 complete loss of graft. There were cyclops-like mass lesions in 12 patients, but none showed an extension limitation or pain at extension. The position of the tibial tunnel on the sagittal and coronal view was similar to the position of the normal ACL tibial insertion. The measured tibial tunnel widening on the radiographs at final follow-up was 2.2 ± 1.5 mm.

Conclusions

Reconstruction of the ACL by use of preservation and femoral tensioning of the remnant tissue showed good clinical results without increased concerns regarding incorrect tunnel formation. Postoperative MRI showed an increased incidence of cyclops-like mass lesions, but no clinical significance was observed.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report no conflict of interest.

 

Note: To access the video accompanying this report, visit the August issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.

PII: S0749-8063(11)00219-2

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.002

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 27, Issue 8 , Pages 1079-1089, August 2011