Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 188-195, February 2012

Optimizing Pressurized Contact Area in Rotator Cuff Repair: The Diamondback Repair

  • Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
    • The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., 150 E Sonterra Blvd, Ste 300, San Antonio, TX 78258, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Patrick J. Denard, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Elifho Obopilwe, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Augustus D. Mazzocca, M.S., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Received 11 February 2011; accepted 22 July 2011. published online 31 October 2011.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare tendon-bone footprint contact area over time under physiologic loads for 4 different rotator cuff repair techniques: single row (SR), triangle double row (DR), chain-link double row (CL), and diamondback double row (DBK).

Methods

A supraspinatus tear was created in 28 human cadavers. Tears were fixed with 1 of 4 constructs: SR, DR, CL, or DBK. Immediate post-repair measurements of pressurized contact area were taken in neutral rotation and 0° of abduction. After a static tensile load, pressurized contact area was observed over a 160-minute period after repair. Cyclic loading was then performed.

Results

The DBK repair had the highest pressurized contact area initially, as well as the highest pressurized contact area and lowest percentage decrease in pressurized contact area after 160 minutes of testing. The DBK repair had significantly larger initial pressurized contact than CL (P = .003) and SR (P = .004) but not DR (P = .06). The DBK technique was the only technique that produced a pressurized contact area that exceeded the native footprint both at initial repair (P = .01) and after 160 minutes of testing (P = .01). DBK had a significantly larger mean pressurized contact area than all the repairs after 160 minutes of testing (P = .01). DBK had a significantly larger post–cyclic loading pressurized contact area than CL (P = .01) and SR (P = .004) but not DR (P = .07).

Conclusions

This study showed that a diamondback repair (a modification of the transosseous repair) can significantly increase the rotator cuff pressurized contact area in comparison with other standard rotator cuff repair constructs when there is sufficient tendon mobility to perform a double-row repair without excessive tension on the repair site.

Clinical Relevance

The persistent pressurized contact area of a DBK repair may be desirable to enhance healing potential when there is sufficient tendon mobility to perform a double-row repair, particularly for large or massive rotator cuff tears where it is important to optimize footprint area and contact to encourage biologic healing.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 S.S.B. receives inventor's royalties from and is a paid consultant for Arthrex, Naples, FL. A.D.M. is a paid consultant for and receives research or institutional support from Arthrex. The other authors report no conflict of interest.

PII: S0749-8063(11)00998-4

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.021

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 188-195, February 2012