Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 283-293, February 2012

Surgical Treatment of Chronic Retrocalcaneal Bursitis

  • Johannes I. Wiegerinck, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Johannes I. Wiegerinck, M.Sc., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Aimee C. Kok, M.D.
  • ,
  • C. Niek van Dijk, M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 29 July 2011; accepted 24 September 2011.

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the results of surgical treatments for chronic retrocalcaneal bursitis (RB).

Methods

Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Embase, and the Cochrane Library (1945 to December 2010) were systematically searched for the following terms: calcaneal AND (prominence OR exostosis) OR ((retrocalcaneal OR calcan*) AND (burs* OR exosto* OR prominence)) OR Haglund[tw] OR Haglund's[tw] OR ((retrocalcaneal OR calcan*) AND (ostectom* OR osteotom* OR resect*)). Therapeutic studies on 10 or more subjects with RB were eligible. Quality was assessed by use of the GRADE scale and Downs and Black scale.

Results

Of 876 reviewed abstracts, 15 trials met our inclusion criteria evaluating 547 procedures in 461 patients. Twelve trials reported an open surgical technique; three studies evaluated endoscopic techniques. Differences in patient satisfaction favored the endoscopic technique. The complication rate differed substantially, favoring endoscopic surgery over open surgery.

Conclusions

There are many different surgical techniques to treat RB. Regardless of technique, resecting sufficient bone is essential for a good outcome. Even though the level of evidence of included studies is relatively low, it can be concluded that endoscopic surgery is superior to open intervention for RB. More evidence is a necessity to be more conclusive regarding the best surgical treatment.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.

 

Note: To access the video illustrations accompanying this report, visit the February issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.

PII: S0749-8063(11)01203-5

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.019

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 283-293, February 2012