Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 283-293, February 2012
Surgical Treatment of Chronic Retrocalcaneal Bursitis
Purpose
The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the results of surgical treatments for chronic retrocalcaneal bursitis (RB).
Methods
Medline, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Embase, and the Cochrane Library (1945 to December 2010) were systematically searched for the following terms: calcaneal AND (prominence OR exostosis) OR ((retrocalcaneal OR calcan*) AND (burs* OR exosto* OR prominence)) OR Haglund[tw] OR Haglund's[tw] OR ((retrocalcaneal OR calcan*) AND (ostectom* OR osteotom* OR resect*)). Therapeutic studies on 10 or more subjects with RB were eligible. Quality was assessed by use of the GRADE scale and Downs and Black scale.
Results
Of 876 reviewed abstracts, 15 trials met our inclusion criteria evaluating 547 procedures in 461 patients. Twelve trials reported an open surgical technique; three studies evaluated endoscopic techniques. Differences in patient satisfaction favored the endoscopic technique. The complication rate differed substantially, favoring endoscopic surgery over open surgery.
Conclusions
There are many different surgical techniques to treat RB. Regardless of technique, resecting sufficient bone is essential for a good outcome. Even though the level of evidence of included studies is relatively low, it can be concluded that endoscopic surgery is superior to open intervention for RB. More evidence is a necessity to be more conclusive regarding the best surgical treatment.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.
Note: To access the video illustrations accompanying this report, visit the February issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.
PII: S0749-8063(11)01203-5
doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.019
© 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 283-293, February 2012


