Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 702-710, May 2012

The Modified Finger-Trap Suture Technique: A Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Suture Technique for Graft Fixation

  • Wei-Ren Su, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chun-Hui Chu, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Fei-Shih-Mei Cosmetic Clinic, Taichung, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Cheng-Li Lin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chii-Jen Lin, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • I-Ming Jou, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to I-Ming Jou, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, 138 Sheng Li Road, Tainan 704, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Chih-Wei Chang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

Received 11 March 2011; accepted 14 October 2011. published online 20 January 2012.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the tendon graft holding power of the newly devised modified finger-trap (MFT) suture technique with other currently used sutures.

Methods

We used 40 fresh-frozen porcine flexor profundus tendons randomly divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens. The experimental procedure was designed to assess percent elongation of the suture-tendon construct across four different tendon-grasping techniques: MFT suture, Krackow stitch, locking SpeedWhip stitch (Arthrex, Naples, FL), and nonlocking SpeedWhip stitch. The suture configurations of the MFT suture and Krackow stitch were completed with a No. 2 FiberWire suture (Arthrex). The locking SpeedWhip and nonlocking SpeedWhip stitches were completed with a loop of No. 2 FiberWire suture and a FiberLoop needle (Arthrex). Each tendon was pre-tensioned to 100 N for three cycles and then cyclically loaded to 200 N for 200 cycles. Finally, each tendon was loaded to failure. Percent elongation, load to failure, and mode of failure for each suture-tendon construct were measured.

Results

During the pre-tension phase, the MFT suture had the smallest percent elongation (P = .021) of the suture-graft construct (13.5% ± 1.9%) compared with the Krackow (16.9% ± 1.2%), locking SpeedWhip (17.6% ± 0.6%), and nonlocking SpeedWhip (33.3% ± 5.6%) stitches. During cyclic loading, the MFT suture also showed a significantly smaller percent elongation (P = .037) of the suture-graft construct (27.8% ± 4.9%) than the Krackow (35.8% ± 5.4%), locking SpeedWhip (33.7% ± 5.4%), and nonlocking SpeedWhip (43.8% ± 7.8%) stitches. The load to failure and cross-sectional area were not significantly different across all the suture groups.

Conclusions

The newly devised MFT suture provided better percent elongation and equal load to failure compared with the Krackow and SpeedWhip suture techniques tested in this in vitro biomechanical evaluation.

Clinical Relevance

The MFT suture is a simple method that is an attractive alternative to the Krackow and SpeedWhip suture techniques for tendon graft fixation in ligament reconstruction.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.

 

Note: To access the video accompanying this report, visit the May issue of Arthroscopy at www.arthroscopyjournal.org.

PII: S0749-8063(11)01215-1

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.014

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 5 , Pages 702-710, May 2012