Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 204-210, February 2012

Computer-Assisted Modeling of Osseous Impingement and Resection in Femoroacetabular Impingement

  • Asheesh Bedi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • MedSport, Section of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Asheesh Bedi, M.D., MedSport, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr, Lobby A, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Mark Dolan, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Northwestern Orthopaedic Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Erin Magennis, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Hip Pain and Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Joseph Lipman, M.S.E.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Hip Pain and Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Robert Buly, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Hip Pain and Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Bryan T. Kelly, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Hip Pain and Preservation, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Received 26 May 2011; accepted 1 November 2011.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of computer-assisted 3-dimensional modeling in diagnosing and treating symptomatic hip impingement.

Methods

Eight patients with symptomatic, focal cam and/or pincer impingement lesions underwent high-resolution computed tomography scans and computer-assisted, 3-dimensional modeling of the involved hip. Cam location, alpha angle, neck-shaft angle, femoral version, and acetabular version at the 12-o'clock through 3-o'clock positions were measured. The model was subsequently dynamized to define the preoperative range of motion and location of impingement with hip flexion, internal rotation, and internal rotation at 90° of hip flexion. Virtual cam and pincer osteoplasty was performed to establish normal head-neck offset and head sphericity and to eliminate focal rim impingement lesions. Range of motion and location of impingement were reassessed after resection in the defined area of impingement.

Results

The cam lesion was located between the 12-o'clock and 4-o'clock positions in all cases. The mean alpha angle was 66.4° (range, 53° to 80°). Mean femoral version was 14.6° (range, 5° to 23°). Mean preoperative hip flexion was 109.7° (range, 87.5° to 125.5°), and mean internal rotation at 90° of hip flexion was 16.2° (range, 1.7° to 25.5°). The location of impingement was unique in each case and not predictable based on radiographic measures alone. Virtual osteoplasty in the defined regions of impingement resulted in significant improvements in both hip flexion and internal rotation (P < .05).

Conclusions

Computed tomography–based computer modeling can localize regions of anticipated mechanical impingement in symptomatic patients with hip pain. Computer-assisted navigation may be a valuable surgical tool to more accurately and reliably eliminate offending impingement lesions.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, diagnostic study.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.

PII: S0749-8063(11)01267-9

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.005

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 204-210, February 2012