“I believe in scientific interaction as the basic part of continuous medical education.”
“I understand the importance that sound scientific literature plays in my practice and the practice of orthopaedic surgery and arthroscopy as a whole.”
“Active involvement in the process of assessment of orthopaedic literature has been useful for my patients, as well as of service to the surgical community as a whole.”
“The area of small joint arthroscopy in the hand, wrist and elbow is evolving rapidly. My fellowship training provided me with a rich experience in small joint arthroscopy, and I would like to further the progress in this field by contributing with my own studies, and by reviewing others experiences as we learn more about what is possible with arthroscopy in the small joints of the upper extremity.”
What Is Expected of Me as a Reviewer?
Reviews should be completed and submitted online within two weeks.
Reviews should be comprehensive, containing Confidential Comments to the Editor and constructive Comments to the Author in each of the 11 sections of the manuscript.
Click HERE for an
example of a superb review to give you an idea of what we are looking for. [link to PDF of superb review provided]
How Do I Become a Reviewer for Arthroscopy?
Click HERE to access the Journal Review Course, Essentials of the Manuscript, a PowerPoint presentation. This course contains many guidelines, insights and tips into writing and reviewing articles. Please take some time to carefully go through this course.
Click HERE to register on our manuscript tracking website, EES. Be sure to select your Personal Classifications so we will know which types of articles to send you.
Click HERE to complete an email that will notify us that you are ready to review manuscripts.
