This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
Suture anchors of various designs are gaining acceptance for open and arthroscopic
procedures. The rapid proliferation of these devices challenges those using them to
apply objective criteria for device selection. Comparative data on implant security
in different settings, modes of failure, and ultimate failure strengths is lacking.
This study was undertaken to independently develop such data for an objective comparison
of the suture anchors currently available. Using a fresh never-frozen porcine femur
model, 10 samples of each of the 14 different anchors tested were inserted int each
of the three different test areas: diaphyseal cortex (usually 3- to 4-mm thick), metaphyseal
cortex (usually 1- to 2-mm thick), and a cancellous bone “trough”. The suture anchors
were threaded with 0.018-inch stainless steel wire or, for anchors requiring a more
flexible suture, 0.018-inch stainless steel 1 × 7 wire braid. Tensile stress parallel
to the axis of insertion was applied at a rate of 12.5 mm/second by an Instron 1321
(Instron Corp.,City, State) until failure. Average failure strength was calculated
for each anchor at each test area. The anchors tested were the Mitek G2, Mitek G3,
Mitek G4 (Mitek Surgical Products, Norwood, MA), Linvatec Revo screw (Linvatec, Largo,
FL), Acufex TAG Wedge, Acufex TAG Rod 2 (Acufex Microsurgical Mansfield, MA), Statak
models 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.0, and 5.2 (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN), Arthrex ESP (Arthrex Inc,
Naples, FL), Arthrotek Harpoon, and Arthrotek LactoSorb (Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN). The
average failure strength of each of these anchors in the diaphyscal cortex, metaphyseal
cortex, and cancellous bone is reported. Using Duncan's multiple range test, the Statak
5.0, 5.2, Revo screw, and Mitek G4 showed the highest mean failure strengths in cortical
bone. The Statak 5.0, 5.2, Revo screw, and Mitek G2 had the highest mean failure strengths
in cancellous bone. The Revo screw was the most consistent of these anchors in all
locations showing very little variation in failure strength despite variations in
location or bone density. Mode of failure (anchor pullout, suture cutout of the anchor,
or wire breakage) was generally consistent for each anchor type, although some variations
occurred in different test areas. The size of the insertion hole is clinically important
and each anchor's performance was evaluated as a function of its minor diameter or
drill hole. All screw anchors were compared and the larger the screw anchor, the higher
the mean failure strengths in all three test environments. In contrast, larger drill
holes for non-screw anchors resulted in lower mean failure strengths in cancellous
bone. Those anchors suitable for a bioabsorbable construct (ESP, Mitek G3, LactoSorb,
Acutex TAG Rod 2, and Acufex TAG Wedge) were evaluated together. In this group, for
diaphyseal cortex, larger drill holes resulted in higher mean failure strengths. Considering
the metallic anchors in cancellous bone, larger drill holes lead to lower mean pullout
strengths.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Modification of the Bankart reconstruction with a suture anchor report of a new technique.Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 343-346
- Suture anchors for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.in: Instructional Course, Annual Meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Palm Desert, CAApril 1–4, 1993
- Anterior shoulder repairs using a suture to bone anchor: Description of technique and clinical results.in: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Technical Exhibit 3716, Anaheim, CAMarch 7–11, 1991
- Efficacy and pitfalls of the Statak soft-tissue attachment device for the Bankart repair.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1993; 2: 216-220
- Anterior and anterior-inferior shoulder instability: Treatment by glenoid labrum reconstruction and a modified capsular shift procedure.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1993; 2: 305-313
- Repair of avulsed insertion of biceps.in: A new technique in four cases. Ed 4. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75. 1993: 938-939
- Arthroscopically enhanced “miniapproach” to rotator cuff repair.Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22: 19-25
- Suture anchor failure strengt—An in vivo study.Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 647-652
- Biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament failure: An analysis of strain-rate sensitivity and mechanisms of failure in primates.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56: 236-253
- Pull-out strength of five suture anchors.Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 109-113
- Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs.Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21: 874-879
Cawley PW, Howard M, Lane J, Robertson D, Zaretsky S. Comparative evaluation of bone suture anchor systems in human cadaveric shoulders: A biomechanical investigation. Am J Sports Med (in press).
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 1995 Published by Elsevier Inc.