Advertisement
Original Articles| Volume 18, ISSUE 5, P488-491, May 2002

Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability

  • Stephen S. Burkhart
    Affiliations
    Baylor College of Medicine (S.S.B) and The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas (S.S.B., A.M.T., P.M.P.), U.S.A.; and the Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa (J.F.D.)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joe F. DeBeer
    Affiliations
    Baylor College of Medicine (S.S.B) and The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas (S.S.B., A.M.T., P.M.P.), U.S.A.; and the Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa (J.F.D.)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Armin M. Tehrany
    Affiliations
    Baylor College of Medicine (S.S.B) and The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas (S.S.B., A.M.T., P.M.P.), U.S.A.; and the Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa (J.F.D.)
    Search for articles by this author
  • Peter M. Parten
    Affiliations
    Baylor College of Medicine (S.S.B) and The San Antonio Orthopaedic Group, San Antonio, Texas (S.S.B., A.M.T., P.M.P.), U.S.A.; and the Sports Science Institute of South Africa, Cape Town, South Africa (J.F.D.)
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Purpose: Our goal was to establish a consistent methodology for quantifying glenoid bone loss by arthroscopic means. Type of Study: This study was an anatomic investigation of glenoid structure and its consistent anatomic landmarks as determined by arthroscopic means in live subjects and by direct measurement in fresh-frozen cadaver specimens. Methods: We arthroscopically evaluated and measured the location of the bare spot of the glenoid in 56 subjects that had no evidence of instability (average age, 40 years). We also measured the exact location of the glenoid bare spot in 10 cadaver shoulders (average age, 76 years). Results: The bare spot of the glenoid was a consistent reference point from which to determine glenoid bone loss because it was located almost exactly at the center of the circle that was defined by the articular margin of the inferior glenoid below the level of the midglenoid notch. The tightly clustered standard deviations of the bare spot measurements in both the live subjects and the cadaver specimens confirmed its consistent location. Conclusions: The glenoid bare spot can be used as a central reference point to quantify the percentage bone loss of the inferior glenoid. Such objective measurement of glenoid bone loss can be clinically useful to the surgeon in deciding whether bone grafting is necessary to restore stability to the shoulder with a bone-deficient glenoid.
      Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 18, No 5 (May-June), 2002: pp 488–491

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Burkhart SS
        • DeBeer JF
        Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: Significance of the glenoid’s “inverted pear” and the humeral “engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.”.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 677-694
        • Latarjet M.
        Techniques chirurgicales dans le trairement de la luxation anteriointerne recidivante de I’épaule.
        Lyon Chir. 1965; 61: 313-318
        • Bigliani LU
        • Newton PM
        • Steinmann SP
        • Connor PM
        • McIlveen SJ
        Glenoid rim lesions associated with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder.
        Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26: 41-45
        • Ungersböck A
        • Michel M
        • Hertel R.
        Factors influencing the results of a modified Bankart procedure.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995; 5: 365-369
        • Itoi E
        • Lee SB
        • Berglund LJ
        • Berge LL
        • An KN
        The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior instability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: A cadaver study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 35-46
        • Tehrany AM
        • Burkhart SS
        The bare spot: A method of evaluating bone loss in glenohumeral instability.
        in: Presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Seattle, WAApril 20, 2001