Advertisement

Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder

      Abstract

      A number of instruments have been developed to measure the quality of life in patients with various conditions of the shoulder. Older instruments appear to have been developed at a time when little information was available on the appropriate methodology for instrument development. Much progress has been made in this area, and currently an appropriate instrument exists for each of the main conditions of the shoulder. Investigators planning clinical trials should select modern instruments that have been developed with appropriate patient input for item generation and reduction, and established validity and reliability. Among the other factors discussed in this review, responsiveness of an instrument is an important consideration as it can serve to minimize the sample size for a proposed study. The shoulder instruments reviewed include the Rating Sheet for Bankart Repair (Rowe), ASES Shoulder Evaluation Form, UCLA Shoulder Score, The Constant Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS), the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rotator Cuff Quality of Life (RC-QOL), and the Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS).

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rowe C.R.
        • Patel D.
        • Southmard W.W.
        The Bankart procedure—A study of late results.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59: 122
        • Amstutz H.C.
        • Sew Hoy A.L.
        • Clarke I.C.
        UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop. 1981; 155: 7-20
        • Ellman H.
        • Hanker G.
        • Bayer M.
        Repair of rotator cuff. Factors influencing reconstruction.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68: 1136-1144
        • Romeo A.A.
        • Bach Jr, B.R.
        • O’Halloran K.L.
        Scoring systems for shoulder conditions.
        Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 472-476
        • Roach K.E.
        • Budiman-Mak E.
        • Songsiridej N.
        • Lertratanakul Y.
        Development of a shoulder pain and disability index.
        Arthritis Care Res. 1991; 4: 143-149
        • Richards R.R.
        • An K.-N.
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Friedman R.J.
        • Gartsman G.M.
        • Gristina A.G.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Mow V.C.
        • Sidles J.A.
        • Zuckerman J.D.
        A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994; 3: 347-352
        • Constant C.R.
        • Murley A.H.G.
        A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.
        Clin Orthop. 1987; 214: 160-164
        • Conboy V.B.
        • Morris R.W.
        • Kiss J.
        • Carr A.J.
        An evaluation of the Constant-Murley Shoulder Assessment.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78: 229-232
        • Hudak P.L.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Bombardier C.
        Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG).
        Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 602-608
      1. Solway S. Beaton D.E. McConnell S. Bombardier C. The DASH outcome measure user’s manual. Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario2002
        • Verbrugge L.M.
        • Jette A.M.
        The disablement process.
        Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38: 1-14
        • Haworth R.J.
        • Hopkins J.
        • Ells P.
        • Ackroyd C.E.
        • Mowat A.G.
        Expectations and outcome of total hip replacement.
        Rheumatol Rehabil. 1981; 20: 65-70
        • Lieberman J.R.
        • Dorey F.
        • Shekelle P.
        • Schumacher L.
        • Thomas B.J.
        • Kilgus D.J.
        • Finerman G.A.
        Differences between patients’ and physicians’ evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 80: 835-838
        • Kirkley A.
        • Griffin S.
        • McLintock H.
        • Ng L.
        The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability.
        Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26: 764-772
        • Kirkley A.
        • Griffin S.
        • Alvarez C.
        The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for rotator cuff disease.
        Clin J Sport Med. 2003; 13: 84-92
        • Richards R.R.
        • Harniman E.
        A long-term follow-up of posterior shoulder stabilizations for recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability. Canadian Orthopaedic Association, London, Ontario2001 (#74)
        • L’Insalata J.C.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Cohen S.B.
        • Altchek D.W.
        • Peterson M.G.
        A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 738-748
        • Lippitt S.B.
        • Harryman II, D.T.
        • Matsen III, F.A.
        A practical tool for evaluating function.
        in: Matsen F.A. Fu F.H. Hawkins R.J. The shoulder A balance of mobilty and stability. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL1992: 501-518
        • Rowe C.R.
        Evaluation of the shoulder.
        in: The shoulder. Churchill-Livingstone, New York1988: 631-637
        • Barrett W.P.
        • Franklin J.L.
        • Jackins S.E.
        • Wyss C.R.
        • Matsen III, F.A.
        Total shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69: 865-872
        • Kirshner B.
        • Guyatt G.
        A methodological framework for assessing health indices.
        J Chronic Dis. 1985; 38: 27-35
        • Lo I.K.Y.
        • Griffin S.
        • Kirkley A.
        The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder.
        Arthritis Cartilage. 2001; 9: 771-778
        • Kirkley A.
        The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). 2001: 1-89 (Thesis/Dissertation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada)
        • Kirkley A.
        • Griffin S.
        • Richards C.
        • Miniaci A.
        • Mohtadi N.
        Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 15: 507-514
        • Hollinshead R.M.
        • Mohtadi N.G.
        • Vande Guchte R.A.
        • Wadey V.M.
        Two 6-year follow-up studies of large and massive rotator cuff tears.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9: 373-381
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Townsend M.
        • Berman L.B.
        • Keller J.L.
        A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 1129-1133
        • Dawson J.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • Carr A.
        Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78: 593-600
        • Dawson J.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • Carr A.
        The assessment of shoulder instability.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81: 420-426
        • Dawson J.
        • Hill G.
        • Fitzpatrick R.
        • Carr A.
        The benefits of using patient-based methods of assessment.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83: 877-882

      Further reading

        • Barrack R.L.
        • Skinner H.B.
        The sensory function of knee ligaments.
        in: Daniel D.M. Akeson W.H. O’Connor J.J. Knee ligaments Structure, function, injury and repair. Raven, New York1990
        • Juniper E.F.
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Jaeschke R.
        How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument.
        in: Spilker B. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia1996: 49-56