Right and left knee laxity measurements: a prospective study of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and normal control subjects


      The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare knee laxity in a group of patients with a unilateral right anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and a group of patients with a unilateral left ACL rupture. Another goal was to analyze and compare the knee laxity of the right and left knees in a group of persons without any known knee problems.

      Type of study

      Prospective examination of the same patients preoperatively and 2 years after the reconstruction with examination of the healthy controls at 2 different occasions.


      Group A was composed of 41 patients with a right-sided chronic ACL rupture, and group B was composed of 44 patients with a left-sided chronic ACL rupture. All patients underwent an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Group C was composed of 35 persons without any known knee problems. One experienced physiotherapist performed all the KT-1000 measurements and the clinical examinations.


      Group A displayed an increased difference in side-to-side laxity between the injured and non-injured side compared with group B in terms of both anterior and total knee laxity. This difference was found to be statistically significant preoperatively (P = .01, anterior; P = .001, total) and at follow-up evaluation 2 years after the index surgery (P = .008, anterior; P = .006, total). In group C, a significant increase was seen in absolute anterior and total laxity in the right knee compared with the left knee when 2 repeated measurements were performed (P < .0001 and P = .003, anterior; P < .0001 and P = .001, total).


      The KT-1000 arthrometer revealed a significant increase in laxity measurements in right knees compared with left knees. This difference was found both preoperatively and postoperatively in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. The same thing was found in a group of persons without any known knee problems.

      Level of evidence

      Level II.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Andersson C.
        • Gillquist J.
        Instrumented testing for evaluation of sagittal knee laxity.
        Clin Orthop. 1990; 256: 178-184
        • Hanten W.P.
        • Pace M.B.
        Reliability of measuring anterior laxity of the knee joint using a knee ligament arthrometer.
        Phys Ther. 1987; 67: 357-359
        • Markolf K.L.
        • Amstutz H.C.
        The clinical relevance of instrumented testing for ACL insufficiency. Experience with the UCLA clinical knee testing apparatus.
        Clin Orthop. 1987; 223: 198-207
        • Anderson A.F.
        • Snyder R.B.
        • Federspiel C.F.
        • Lipscomb A.B.
        Instrumented evaluation of knee laxity.
        Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 135-140
        • Balasch H.
        • Schiller M.
        • Friebel H.
        • Hoffmann F.
        Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter. A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7: 204-208
        • Daniel D.M.
        • Stone M.L.
        • Sachs R.
        • Malcom L.
        Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption.
        Am J Sports Med. 1985; 13: 401-407
        • Mononen T.
        • Alaranta H.
        • Harilainen A.
        • Sandelin J.
        • Vanhanen I.
        • Osterman K.
        Instrumented measurement of anterior-posterior translation in knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament tear.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997; 116: 283-286
        • Anderson A.F.
        • Lipscomb A.B.
        Preoperative instrumented testing of anterior and posterior knee laxity.
        Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17: 387-392
        • Bach Jr, B.R.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Flynn W.M.
        • Kroll M.
        • Wickiewiecz T.L.
        Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72: 1299-1306
        • Highgenboten C.L.
        • Jackson A.W.
        • Jansson K.A.
        • Meske N.B.
        KT-1000 arthrometer.
        Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 450-454
        • Forster I.W.
        • Warren-Smith C.D.
        • Tew M.
        Is the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989; 71: 843-847
        • Riederman R.
        • Wroble R.R.
        • Grood E.S.
        • VanGinkel L.
        • Shaffer B.L.
        Reproducibility of the knee signature system.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 660-664
        • Wroble R.R.
        • Van Ginkel L.A.
        • Grood E.S.
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Shaffer B.L.
        Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 396-399
        • Daniel M.
        • Malcolm L.
        • Stone M.
        • Perth H.
        • Morgan J.
        • Riehl B.
        Quantification of knee stability and function.
        Contemp Orthop. 1982; 5: 83-91
        • Liu S.H.
        • Osti L.
        • Henry M.
        • Bocchi L.
        The diagnosis of acute complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Comparison of MRI, arthrometry and clinical examination.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77: 586-588
        • Myrer J.W.
        • Schulthies S.S.
        • Fellingham G.W.
        Relative and absolute reliability of the KT-2000 arthrometer for uninjured knees. Testing at 67, 89, 134, and 178 N and manual maximum forces.
        Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 104-108
        • Rangger C.
        • Daniel D.M.
        • Stone M.L.
        • Kaufman K.
        Diagnosis of an ACL disruption with KT-1000 arthrometer measurements.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993; 1: 60-66
        • Stäubli H.U.
        • Jakob R.P.
        Anterior knee motion analysis. Measurement and simultaneous radiography.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 172-177
        • Strand T.
        • Solheim E.
        Clinical tests versus KT-1000 instrumented laxity test in acute anterior cruciate ligament tears.
        Int J Sports Med. 1995; 16: 51-53
        • Eastlack M.E.
        • Axe M.J.
        • Snyder-Mackler L.
        Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31: 210-215
        • Risberg M.A.
        • Holm I.
        • Steen H.
        • Beynnon B.D.
        Sensitivity to changes over time for the IKDC form, the Lysholm score, and the Cincinnati knee score. A prospective study of 120 ACL reconstructed patients with a 2-year follow-up.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7: 152-159
        • Snyder-Mackler L.
        • Fitzgerald G.K.
        • Bartolozzi III, A.R.
        • Ciccotti M.G.
        The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury.
        Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 191-195
        • Tyler T.F.
        • McHugh M.P.
        • Gleim G.W.
        • Nicholas S.J.
        Association of KT-1000 measurements with clinical tests of knee stability 1 year following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999; 29: 540-545
        • Hang Y.S.
        • Fung W.C.
        • Hang D.
        Quantitative test of knee laxity in Chinese.
        J Formos Med Assoc. 1993; 92: 907-910
        • Shino K.
        • Inoue M.
        • Horibe S
        • et al.
        Measurement of anterior instability of the knee. A new apparatus for clinical testing.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987; 69: 608-613
        • Musgrove T.P.
        • Salmon L.J.
        • Burt C.F.
        • Pinczewski L.A.
        The influence of reverse-thread screw femoral fixation on laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon.
        Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 695-699
        • Fiebert I.
        • Gresley J.
        • Hoffman S.
        • Kunkel K.
        Comparative measurements of anterior tibial translation using the KT-1000 knee arthrometer with the leg in neutral, internal rotation, and external rotation.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994; 19: 331-334
        • Oliver J.H.
        • Coughlin L.P.
        Objective knee evaluation using the Genucom Knee Analysis System. Clinical implications.
        Am J Sports Med. 1987; 15: 571-578
        • Nawata K.
        • Teshima R.
        • Morio Y
        • et al.
        Anterior-posterior knee laxity increased by exercise. Quantitative evaluation of physiologic changes.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1999; 70: 261-264
        • Skinner H.B.
        • Wyatt M.P.
        • Stone M.L
        • et al.
        Exercise-related knee joint laxity.
        Am J Sports Med. 1986; 14: 30-34
        • Sumen Y.
        • Ochi M.
        • Adachi N
        • et al.
        Anterior laxity and MR signals of the knee after exercise. A comparison of 9 normal knees and 6 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1999; 70: 256-260
        • Wojtys E.M.
        • Wylie B.B.
        • Huston L.J.
        The effects of muscle fatigue on neuromuscular function and anterior tibial translation in healthy knees.
        Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 615-621
        • Tegner Y.
        • Lysholm J.
        • Lysholm M.
        • Gillquist J.
        Rating systems in evaluation of knee ligament injuries.
        Clin Orthop. 1985; 198: 43-49
        • Höher J.
        • Bach T.
        • Munster A
        • et al.
        Does the mode of data collection change results in a subjective knee score? Self-administration versus interview.
        Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 642-647
        • Tegner Y.
        • Lysholm J.
        • Lysholm M.
        • Gillquist J.
        A performance test to monitor rehabilitation and evaluate anterior cruciate ligament injuries.
        Am J Sports Med. 1986; 14: 156-159
        • Gauffin H.
        • Tropp H.
        • Odenrick P.
        Effect of ankle disk training on postural control in patients with functional instability of the ankle joint.
        Int J Sports Med. 1988; 9: 141-144
        • Hefti F.
        • Müller W.
        • Jakob R.P.
        • Stäubli H.U.
        Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993; 1: 226-234
        • Brandsson S.
        • Faxén E.
        • Kartus J
        • et al.
        Is a knee brace advantageous after anterior cruciate ligament surgery? A prospective, randomised study with a two-year follow-up.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001; 11: 110-114
        • Kartus J.
        • Stener S.
        • Köhler K
        • et al.
        Is bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction necessary? A 2-year follow-up of 78 consecutive patients rehabilitated with or without a brace.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997; 5: 157-161
        • Risberg M.A.
        • Holm I.
        • Steen H
        • et al.
        The effect of knee bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 76-83
        • Rosene J.
        • Fogarty T.D.
        Anterior tibial translation in collegiate athletes with normal anterior cruciate ligament integrity.
        J Athletic Training. 1999; 34: 93-98
        • Torzilli P.A.
        • Panariello R.A.
        • Forbes A
        • et al.
        Measurement reproducibility of two commercial knee test devices.
        J Orthop Res. 1991; 9: 730-737
        • Karageanes S.J.
        • Blackburn K.
        • Vangelos Z.A.
        The association of the menstrual cycle with the laxity of the anterior cruciate ligament in adolescent female athletes.
        Clin J Sport Med. 2000; 10: 162-168
        • Steiner M.E.
        • Grana W.A.
        • Chillag K.
        • Schelberg-Karnes E.
        The effect of exercise on anterior-posterior knee laxity.
        Am J Sports Med. 1986; 14: 24-29
        • Werlich T.
        • Brand H.
        • Echtermeyer V.
        • Pohlmann J.
        The knee arthrometer KT-1000.
        Aktuelle Traumatol. 1993; 23: 43-49
        • Fridén T.
        • Sommerlath K.
        • Egund N
        • et al.
        Instability after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1992; 63: 593-598
        • Jorn L.P.
        • Fridén T.
        • Ryd L.
        • Lindstrand A.
        Simultaneous measurements of sagittal knee laxity with an external device and radiostereometric analysis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80: 169-172