Purpose: This study compares rotator cuff repair strength after cyclic loading of bioabsorbable
tacks and traditional transosseous sutures, and correlates the results with bone density,
age, and gender. The hypotheses were that tack repair strength would be inferior to
transosseous sutures and that repair strength would be directly related to bone quality.
Type of Study: In vitro randomized biomechanical study. Methods: Eight paired cadaveric shoulders with a standardized supraspinatus defect were randomized
to tack or suture repair and subjected to step-wise cyclic loading. Repair migration
was measured by quantifying the motion of markers affixed to tendon and bone using
a digital camera. Failure mode, cycles, and load were measured for 50% and 100% loss
of repair. Results were correlated with bone density, age, and gender. Results: Tack repairs failed at the tack-tendon interface, whereas suture rupture was the
mode of failure for the suture repairs. Mean values for 50% loss of repair were 206
± 88 cycles and 44 ± 15 N for the sutures, and 1,193 ± 252 cycles and 156 ± 20 N for
the tacks (P < .05). The corresponding values for 100% loss of repair were 2,458 ± 379 cycles
and 294 ± 27 N for the sutures, and 2,292 ± 333 cycles and 263 ± 28 N for the tacks
(P > .05). These results did not correlate with bone density, age, or gender. Conclusions: This study has shown that bioabsorbable tacks provide improved repair strength in
comparison with traditional suture techniques. Repair strength did not correlate with
bone quality, and this may be attributed to failure primarily through the repair construct
or at the tack-tendon interface and not through bone. This report describes a new
high-resolution optical method of measuring tendon repair strength that should be
a useful model for future studies. Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrates the biomechanical advantages of a sutureless tack device
for rotator cuff repair compared with a traditional augmented suture repair technique.
Key Words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- A novel, resorbable suture anchor.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10: 286-291
- Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs.Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 360-364
- Mechanical testing of absorbable suture anchors.Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 188-193
- Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 2152-2160
- The ultimate strength of suture anchors.Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 21-28
- Internal fixation strength of suture anchors–Update 1997.Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 355-362
- Suture anchors–Update 1999.Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 719-725
- Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs.Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 720-724
- The relationship of suture anchor failure and bone density to proximal humerus location.Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 340-345
- Biomechanics of the shoulder.in: Wulker N. Mansat M. Fu F.H. Shoulder Surgery. Martin Dunitz, London2001: 36-53
- Experimental rotator cuff repair.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 1281-1290
- Injury size affects long term strength of the rabbit medial collateral ligament.Clin Orthop. 1997; 337: 272-280
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2005 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.