A Biomechanical Analysis of Two Biceps Tenodesis Fixation Techniques

      Purpose: To assess and compare the biomechanical properties and load-to-failure of 2 biceps tenodesis fixation techniques, interference screw fixation and double suture anchor fixation. Type of Study: Biomechanical study. Methods: Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens were used in this study. A biceps tenodesis was performed using 1 of 2 techniques, interference screw fixation or double suture anchor fixation. A 7-mm interference screw was used in 5 cadaveric trials. A double suture anchor technique was performed in 6 cadaveric specimens. The tenodesis construct in each specimen was loaded to failure using a Servohydraulic materials test system (MTS Model 858; Bionix, MTS Corp, Minneapolis, MN). Each specimen was loaded at 5 mm/second with a preload of 5 N with the vector of pull distally in line with the long axis of the humerus. Each specimen was then loaded until failure of the repair occurred. Statistical analysis of the interference screw group compared with the suture anchor group was performed using a Student t test. Results: The mode of failure of the interference screw group was variable, but the suture anchor group consistently failed at the anchor or anchor eyelet. The average pullout strength of the suture anchor group was 135.5 ± 37.8 N whereas the failure load in the interference group was 233.5 ± 55.5 N. The interference group had a significantly greater resistance to pullout than the suture anchor group (P = .007). Conclusions: Based on these results, a biceps tenodesis using an interference screw will provide greater fixation strength than a biceps tenodesis performed with a double suture anchor technique. Clinical Relevance: The surgeon treating biceps tenodesis may wish to choose a fixation technique with higher initial strength (interference screw instead of double suture anchor) to lessen the chance of early failure, particularly if the patient begins early active elbow flexion.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Pagnani M.J.
        • Deng X.H.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Torzilli P.A.
        • O’Brien S.J.
        Role of the long head of the biceps brachii in glenohumeral stability.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5: 255-262
        • Rodosky M.W.
        • Harner C.D.
        • Fu F.H.
        The role of the long head of the biceps muscle and superior glenoid labrum in anterior stability of the shoulder.
        Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22: 121-130
        • Burkhead Jr, W.Z.
        • Arcand M.A.
        • Zeman C.
        • Habermeyer P.
        • Walch G.
        The biceps tendon.
        in: Rockwood Jr, C.A. Matsen F.A. The shoulder. Ed 2. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1998: 1009-1063
        • Dines D.M.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Inglis A.E.
        Surgical treatment of lesions of the long head of biceps.
        Clin Orthop. 1982; 164: 165-171
        • Habermeyer P.
        • Walch G.
        The biceps tendon and rotator cuff disease.
        in: Burkhead Jr, W.Z. Rotator cuff disorders. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore1996: 142-159
        • Neer C.S.
        Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 41-50
        • Post M.
        Proximal tendonitis of the long head of the biceps.
        Clin Orthop. 1988; 246: 117-124
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • Bindra R.
        Disorders of the biceps tendon.
        in: Iannotti J.P. Williams G.R. Disorders of the shoulder Diagnosis and management. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia1999: 159-190
        • Bennett W.F.
        Visualization of the anatomy of the rotator interval and bicipital sheath.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 107-111
        • Bennett W.F.
        Specificity of the Speed’s test.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 789-796
        • Curtis A.S.
        • Snyder S.J.
        Evaluation and treatment of biceps tendon pathology.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1993; 24: 33-43
        • Gartsman G.M.
        • Taverna E.
        The incidence of glenohumeral joint abnormalities associated with full-thickness, reparable rotator cuff tears.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 450-455
        • DePalma A.F.
        • Callery G.E.
        Bicipital tenosynovitis.
        Clin Orthop. 1954; 3: 69-85
        • Froimson A.I.
        • Oh I.
        Keyhole tenodesis of biceps origin at the shoulder.
        Clin Orthop. 1974; 112: 245-249
        • Hitchcock H.H.
        • Bechtol C.O.
        Painful shoulder. observation on the role of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii in its causation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948; 30: 263-273
        • Gartsman G.M.
        • Hammerman S.M.
        Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 550-552
        • Boileau P.
        Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using an interference screw with trans-osseous drilling. 2000 (Presented at the Annual Closed Meeting of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Austin, TX, October 17)
        • Klepps S.
        • Hazrati Y.
        • Flatow
        Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 1043-1045
        • Lo I.K.Y.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis.
        Oper Tech Sports Med. 2002; 10: 105-112
        • Richards D.P.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Lo I.K.Y.
        Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation.
        Oper Tech Sports Med. 2003; 11: 15-23
        • Barber F.A.
        • Byrd J.W.T.
        • Wolf E.M.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        How would you treat the partially torn biceps tendon?.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 636-639
        • Ejerhed L.
        • Kartus J.
        • Sernert N.
        • Kohler K.
        • Karlsson J.
        Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 19-25
        • Brand J.C.
        • Pienkowski D.
        • Steenlage E.
        • Hamilton
        • Johnson D.L.
        • Caborn D.N.
        Interference screw fixation strength of a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft is directly related to bone mineral density and insertion torque.
        Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 705-710
        • Caborn D.N.M.
        • Coen M.
        • Neef R.
        • Hamilton D.
        • Nyland J.
        • Johnson D.L.
        Quadrupled semitendinosus-gracilis autograft fixation in the femoral tunnel.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 241-245
        • Magen H.E.
        • Howell S.M.
        • Hull M.L.
        Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts.
        Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 35-43
        • Simonian P.T.
        • Monson J.T.
        • Larson R.V.
        Biodegradable interference screw augmentation reduces tunnel expansion after ACL reconstruction.
        Am J Knee Surg. 2001; 14: 104-108
        • Stadeimaier D.M.
        • Lowe W.R.
        • Ilahi O.A.
        • Noble P.C.
        • Kohl H.W.
        Cyclic pullout strength of hamstring tendon graft fixation with soft tissue interference screws. Influence of screw length.
        Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 778-783
        • Weiler A.
        • Hoffmann R.F.
        • Siepe C.J.
        • Kolbeck S.F.
        • Sudkamp N.P.
        The influence of screw geometry on hamstring tendon interference fit fixation.
        Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 356-359
        • Weiler A.
        • Hoffmann R.F.
        • Stähelin A.C.
        • Bail H.J.
        • Siepe C.J.
        • Südkamp N.P.
        • Klinikum V.
        Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 29-37
        • Barber F.A.
        • Feder S.M.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Ahrens J.
        The relationship of suture anchor failure and bone density to proximal humerus location.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 340-345
        • Barber F.A.
        • Herbert M.A.
        Suture anchors.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 719-725
        • Barber F.A.
        • Herbert M.
        • Click J.
        Internal fixation strength of suture anchors.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 355-362
        • Barber F.A.
        • Herbert M.A.
        • Click J.N.
        Suture anchor strength revisited.
        Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 32-38
        • Barber F.A.
        • Herbert M.A.
        • Click J.N.
        Ultimate strength of suture anchors.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 21-28
        • Barber F.A.
        • Herbert M.A.
        • Richards D.P.
        Sutures and suture anchors.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 985-990
        • Meyer D.C.
        • Nyffeler R.W.
        • Fucentese S.F.
        • Gerber C.
        Failure of suture material at suture anchor eyelets.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 1013-1019