Advertisement

Analysis of Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With 5-Year Follow-up: Allograft Versus Autograft

      Purpose: To prospectively compare outcomes of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with either Achilles tendon allograft with soft-tissue fixation or standard bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft with interference screw fixation. Type of Study: Prospective comparative case series. Methods: A group of 41 patients who underwent soft-tissue allograft reconstruction and a group of 118 patients who underwent autograft bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstruction were included in the final results. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 to 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then annually for 5 years. Objective measures of outcome included KT-1000 measurements, range of motion, ligamentous integrity, thigh atrophy, and International Knee Documentation Committee score. Subjective evaluations included patient completion of 5 questionnaires documenting functional status, pain, and health-related quality of life: (1) the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, (2) a patient subjective assessment of knee function and symptoms, (3) a patient subjective assessment follow-up, (4) a knee pain scale, and (5) the RAND 36-Item Health Survey. Mixed models analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes of the treatment groups using baseline values of the study variables as a covariate. Results: Autograft patients reported significantly more pain on the bodily pain subscale of the RAND-36 than the allograft group at 1 week (P = .0006), 6 weeks (P = .0007), and 3 months (P = .0270). Autograft patients reported more pain than allograft patients on the McGill Pain Scale visual analog scale at 1 to 2 weeks (P < .0001) and 6 weeks (P = .0147). Patient assessment of function and symptoms showed that a higher proportion of patients reported normal or nearly normal knee function in the allograft group than in the autograft group at 3 months (33% v 14%, P = .0558, respectively). Fewer activity limitations were reported by allograft patients than autograft patients at 6 weeks (P = .0501), 3 months (P = .0431), and 6 months (P = .0014). After reconstruction, the allograft group displayed significantly more laxity in KT-1000 measurements at all time points than the autograft group (P = .0520). These measurements decreased over time for both groups (P < .0001). Conclusions: Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with allograft versus autograft were compared objectively and subjectively. Both groups of patients achieved similar long-term outcomes. Overall, the allograft patients reported less pain at 1 and 6 weeks after surgery, better function at 1 week, 3 months, and 1 year, and fewer activity limitations throughout the follow-up period. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Eriksson E.
        Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1976; 7: 167-179
        • Feagin Jr, J.A.
        • Curl W.W.
        Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        Am J Sports Med. 1976; 4: 95-100
        • Johnson R.J.
        • Beynnon B.D.
        • Nichols C.E.
        • Renstrom P.A.
        The treatment of injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74: 140-151
        • Jackson R.W.
        The torn ACL.
        in: Feagin J.A. The crucial ligaments Diagnosis and treatment of ligamentous injuries about the knee. Churchill Livingstone, New York1988: 341-348
        • Shelbourne K.D.
        • Nitz P.
        Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 292-299
        • Svensson M.
        • Kartus J.
        • Ejerhed L.
        • Lindahl S.
        • Karlsson J.
        Does the patellar tendon normalize after harvesting its central third.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 34-38
        • Levitt R.L.
        • Malinin T.
        • Posada A.
        • Michalow A.
        Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligaments with bone-patellar tendon-bone and Achilles tendon allografts.
        Clin Orthop. 1994; 303: 67-78
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Barber-Westin S.D.
        Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with human allograft.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78: 524-537
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Barber S.D.
        • Mangine R.E.
        Bone-patellar ligament–bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72: 1125-1136
        • Harner C.D.
        • Olson E.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        • Silverstein S.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Silbey M.
        Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Clin Orthop. 1996; 324: 134-144
        • Shelton W.R.
        • Papendick L.
        • Dukes A.D.
        Autograft versus allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 446-449
        • Olsen E.J.
        Use of soft tissue allografts in sports medicine.
        Adv Oper Orthop. 1993; 1: 111-128
        • Melzack R.
        The McGill Pain Questionnaire.
        Pain. 1975; 1: 277-299
        • Wilkin D.
        • Hallam L.
        • Dogget M.A.
        Measures of need and outcome for primary health care.
        Oxford University Press, Oxford1992
        • Hayes R.D.
        • Sherbourne C.D.
        • Mazel R.M.
        The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.
        Health Econ. 1993; 2: 217-227
        • Rejeski W.J.
        • Ettinger W.H.
        • Shumaker S.
        The evaluation of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
        J Rheum. 1995; 22: 1124-1129
        • Fu F.H.
        • Bennett C.H.
        • Ma C.B.
        • Menetrey J.
        • Lattermann C.
        Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: Operative procedures and clinical correlations.
        Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 124-130
        • Ritchie J.R.
        • Parker R.D.
        Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.
        Clin Orthop. 1996; 325: 65-77
        • Bach B.R.
        • Tradonsky S.
        • Bojchuk J.
        • Levy M.E.
        • Bush-Joseph C.A.
        • Khan N.H.
        Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation.
        Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26: 20-29
        • Buss D.D.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Wickiewicz T.L.
        • Galinat B.J.
        • Panariello R.
        Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. Results after twenty-four to forty-two months.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 1346-1355
        • Howe J.G.
        • Johnson R.J.
        • Kaplan M.J.
        • Fleming B.
        • Jarvinen M.
        Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon graft. Part I: Long-term follow up.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 447-457
        • Buck B.E.
        • Malinin T.I.
        • Brown M.D.
        Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1989; 240: 129-136
        • Jackson D.W.
        • Corsetti J.
        • Simon T.M.
        Biologic incorporation of allograft anterior cruciate ligament replacements.
        Clin Orthop. 1996; 324: 126-133
        • Jackson D.W.
        • Grood E.S.
        • Goldstein J.D.
        • Rosen M.A.
        • Kurzweil P.R.
        • Cummings J.F.
        • Simon T.M.
        A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a goat model.
        Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21: 176-185
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Butler D.L.
        • Grood E.S.
        • Zernicke R.F.
        • Hefzy M.S.
        Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66: 344-352
        • Stringham D.R.
        • Pelmas C.J.
        • Burks R.T.
        • Newman A.P.
        • Marcus R.L.
        Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using patellar tendon autograft or allograft.
        Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 414-421
        • Victor J.
        • Bellemans J.
        • Witvrouw E.
        • Govaers K.
        • Fabry G.
        Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Int Orthop. 1997; 21: 93-97
        • Rosenberg T.D.
        • Franklin J.L.
        • Baldwin G.N.
        • Nelson K.A.
        Extensor mechanism function after patellar tendon graft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 519-525
        • Sachs R.A.
        • Daniel D.M.
        • Stone M.L.
        • Garfein R.
        Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17: 760-765
        • Miller M.D.
        • Harner C.D.
        The use of allograft. Techniques and results.
        Clin Sports Med. 1993; 12: 757-770
        • Simonian P.T.
        • Mann F.A.
        • Mandt P.R.
        Indirect forces and patellar fracture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the patellar ligament. Case report.
        Am J Knee Surg. 1995; 8: 60-64
        • Cole D.W.
        • Ginn T.A.
        • Chen G.J.
        • Smith B.P.
        • Curl W.W.
        • Martin D.F.
        • Poehling G.G.
        Cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 786-790
        • Shino K.
        • Inoue M.
        • Horibe S.
        • Hamada M.
        • Ono K.
        Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using allogeneic tendon. Long-term follow up.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 457-465
        • Lephart S.M.
        • Kocher M.S.
        • Harner C.D.
        • Fu F.H.
        Quadriceps strength and functional capacity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon autograft versus allograft.
        Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21: 738-743
        • Saddemi S.R.
        • Frogameni A.D.
        • Fenton P.J.
        • Hartman J.
        • Hartman W.
        Comparison of perioperative morbidity of anterior cruciate ligament autografts versus allografts.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 519-524
        • Shino K.
        • Nakata K.
        • Horibe S.
        • Inoue M.
        • Nakagawa S.
        Quantitative evaluation after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Allograft versus autograft.
        Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21: 609-616
        • Peterson R.K.
        • Shelton W.R.
        • Bomboy A.L.
        Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 9-13
        • Shelbourne K.D.
        • Trumper R.V.
        Preventing anterior knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 41-47
      1. Koman L.A. Wake Forest University School of Medicine orthopaedic manual 2003. Orthopaedic Press, Winston-Salem, NC2003