Advertisement
Original article| Volume 21, ISSUE 12, P1421-1427, December 2005

Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Using Bioabsorbable Tacks

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of bioabsorbable tacks (Suretac; Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Mansfield, MA) for the arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Type of Study: Prospective case series. Methods: A prospective clinical review was performed on 53 patients (38 men, 15 women) with full-thickness rotator cuff tears repaired arthroscopically using bioabsorbable tacks. Minimum follow-up was 24 months and patients were evaluated using preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) scores and Short-Form 36 Health Surveys (SF-36). A Constant and Murley score was performed at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Results: The average patient age was 51 years (range, 23 to 74 years) and the average time for review was 29 months (range, 24 to 60 months). The average size of rotator cuff tears measured 2.5 cm (range, 1 to 5 cm) and an average of 2 Suretacs (range, 1 to 4) were used for the repair. Ten patients had tears larger than 3 cm and 5 patients had tears that measured 5 cm or larger. The average total score according to the ASES shoulder index improved from 33 to 85 points. The average score for pain improved from 6.9 to 1.3 points. The score for function improved from 11 to 25 points. These results were statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was a significant improvement in all components of the SF-36 survey. The average postoperative Constant score was 87 with the pain component measuring 12 points, range of movement 38 points, and power 21 points. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears using bioabsorbable tacks produces satisfactory outcomes with regard to objective orthopaedic criteria as well as overall patient satisfaction in terms of pain relief and function. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs are technically demanding procedures. The use of tacks facilitates this procedure without any apparent deterioration in clinical results. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Andren L.
        • Lundberg B.J.
        Treatment of rigid shoulders by joint distention during arthroscopy.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1965; 36: 45-53
        • Johnson L.
        Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the shoulder. C. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis1993
        • Levy H.J.
        • Uribe J.W.
        • Delany L.G.
        Arthroscopically-assisted rotator-cuff repair.
        Arthroscopy. 1990; 6: 55-60
        • Blevins F.T.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Cavo C.
        • Altchek D.W.
        • Dines D.
        • Palletta G.
        Arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair.
        Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 50-69
        • Pollock R.G.
        • Flatow E.L.
        Full-thickness tears.
        Orthop Clinic North Am. 1997; 28: 169-177
        • Weber S.C.
        • Schaefer R.
        “Mini-open” versus traditional open repair in the management of small and moderate size tears of the rotator cuff.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 365-366
        • Richards R.R.
        • An K.N.
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • et al.
        A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.
        J Shoulder and Elbow Surg. 1994; 3: 347-352
        • Ware Jr, J.E.
        Standards for validating health measures.
        J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40: 473-480
        • Ware Jr, J.E.
        • Sherbourne C.D.
        The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
        • Constant C.R.
        • Murley A.H.
        A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.
        Clin Orthop. 1987; 214: 160-164
        • Nicholas J.A.
        • Sapega A.
        • Kraus H.
        • Webb J.N.
        Factors influencing manual muscle tests in physical therapy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60: 186-190
        • Caspari R.B.
        • Thal R.
        A technique for arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
        Arthroscopy. 1992; 8: 23-30
        • Burkhart S.S.
        The dead man theory of suture anchors.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 119-123
        • Cofield R.H.
        • Parvizi J.
        • Hoffmeyer P.J.
        • Lanzer W.L.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        • Rowland C.M.
        Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 73-77
        • Hawkins R.J.
        • Misamore G.W.
        • Hobieka P.E.
        Surgery for full thickness rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67: 1349-1355
        • Ianotti J.P.
        Full thickness rotator cuff tears.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994; 2: 87-95
        • De Beer J.F.
        • Boezaart A.P.
        • Van Rooyen K.
        Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair—A review of 96 cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 1: 83
        • Gartsman G.M.
        • Khan M.
        • Hammerman S.M.
        Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 832-840
        • Snyder S.J.
        Technique of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using implantable 4-mm Revo Suture Anchors, Suture Shuttle Relays, and No. 2 nonabsorbable mattress sutures.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1997; 28: 267-275
        • Tauro J.C.
        Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Analysis of technique and results at 2 and 3 year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 45-51
        • Flatow E.L.
        • Bigliani L.U.
        Complications of rotator cuff repair.
        Complication Orthop. 1992; 8: 298-303
        • Kaar T.K.
        • Schenck R.C.
        • Wirth M.A.
        • Rockwood C.A.
        Complications of metallic suture anchors in shoulder surgery.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 31-37
        • Goradia V.K.
        • Mullen D.J.
        • Boucher H.R.
        • Parks B.G.
        • O’Donnell J.B.
        Cyclic loading of rotator cuff repairs.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 360-364
        • Paulos L.E.
        • France E.P.
        • Boam G.W.
        • et al.
        Augmentation of rotator cuff repair.
        Orthop Trans. 1990; 14: 404
        • Speer K.P.
        • Warren R.F.
        Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. A role for biodegradable materials.
        Clin Orthop. 1993; 291: 67-74
        • Snyder S.J.
        • Karzel R.P.
        • Del Pizzo W.
        • Ferkel R.D.
        • Friedman M.J.
        SLAP lesions of the shoulder.
        Arthroscopy. 1990; 6: 274-279
        • Arciero R.A.
        • Taylor D.C.
        • Snyder R.J.
        • Uhorchak J.M.
        Arthroscopic bioabsorbable tack stabilization of initial anterior shoulder dislocations.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 410-417
        • Laurencin C.T.
        • Stephens S.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Altchek D.W.
        Arthroscopic Bankart repair using a degradable tack.
        Clin Orthop. 1996; 332: 132-137
        • Levy H.J.
        • Gardner R.D.
        • Lemak L.J.
        Arthroscopic subacromial decompression in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
        Arthroscopy. 1991; 7: 8-13
        • Ogilvie-Harris D.J.
        • Demaziere A.
        Arthroscopic debridement versus open repair for rotator cuff tears. A prospective cohort study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75: 416-420
        • Rockwood Jr, C.A.
        • Williams G.R.
        • Burkhead Jr, W.Z.
        Debridement of irreparable, degenerative lesions of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77: 857-886
        • Burkart A.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        • Roscher E.
        Foreign-body reaction to the bioabsorbable Suretac device.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 91-95
        • Edwards D.
        • Hoy G.
        • Saies A.
        • Hayes M.
        Adverse reactions to an absorbable fixation device.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994; 3: 230-233
        • Misamore G.W.
        • Ziegler D.W.
        • Rushton H.
        Repair of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77: 1335-1339