Original article| Volume 22, ISSUE 3, P277-282, March 2006

The Accuracy of Subacromial Injections: A Prospective Randomized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

      Purpose: To assess the accuracy of shoulder infiltrations in the subacromial bursa (SAB) by a posterior or an anteromedial approach. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical outcome were used for evaluation. Type of Study: A prospective randomized study. Methods: Thirty-three patients (22 women, 11 men; average age, 46 years; range, 25 to 64 years) with clinical signs of subacromial impingement were infiltrated with a mixture of bupivacaine, methylprednisolone, and gadolinium-DTPA directly followed by MRI to determine the actual site of injection. The SAB was randomly infiltrated posteriorly (n = 17) or anteromedially (n = 16). Injection confidence of the surgeon and body-mass index of the patient were recorded. Follow-up consisted of the Constant Score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale score for pain taken within 24 hours and 6 weeks after infiltration. Results: Thirteen injections (76%) were in the SAB with a posterior approach and 10 (69%) with an anteromedial approach. Many surrounding structures were hit as well, especially the rotator cuff. A positive correlation between the injection confidence of the orthopaedic surgeon and the MRI was found in 66%. Only injection of the SAB alone resulted in a significant decrease of the pain (P = .004) and an increase in the functional scores. Injection in the bursa and rotator cuff muscle showed a significant increase in pain (P = .032) but no change in clinical scores. The body mass index had no influence on the scores. Conclusions: Injections in the SAB are inaccurate, despite the confident feeling of the clinician. The finding that many different structures can be infiltrated with 1 injection can create both false-positive and -negative results. Level of Evidence: Level II.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Neer C.S.
        Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 41-50
        • Neer C.S.
        Impingement lesions.
        Clin Orthop. 1983; 173: 70-77
        • Spangehl M.J.
        • Hawkins R.H.
        • McCormack R.G.
        • Loomer R.L.
        Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11: 101-107
        • van der Heijden G.J.
        • van der Windt D.A.
        • Kleijnen J.
        • Koes B.W.
        • Bouter L.M.
        Steroid injections for shoulder disorders.
        Br J Gen Pract. 1996; 46: 309-316
        • Buchbinder R.
        • Green S.
        • Youd J.M.
        Corticosteroid injections for shoulder pain.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; 1 (CD004016)
        • Ford L.T.
        • DeBender J.
        Tendon rupture after local steroid injection.
        South Med J. 1979; 72: 827-830
        • Kleinman M.
        • Gross A.E.
        Achilles tendon rupture following steroid injection. Report of three cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 1345-1347
        • Hugate R.
        • Pennypacker J.
        • Saunders M.
        • Juliano P.
        The effects of intratendinous and retrocalcaneal intrabursal injections of corticosteroid on the biomechanical properties of rabbit Achilles tendons.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 794-801
        • Kapetanos G.
        The effect of the local corticosteroids on the healing and biomechanical properties of the partially injured tendon.
        Clin Orthop. 1982; 163: 170-179
        • Patel V.R.
        • Singh D.
        • Calvert P.T.
        • Bayley J.I.
        Arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 231-237
        • Kirkley A.
        • Litchfield R.B.
        • Jackowski D.M.
        • Lo I.K.
        The use of the impingement test as a predictor of outcome following subacromial decompression for rotator cuff tendinosis.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 8-15
        • Weber P.C.
        Steroid injection technique.
        Clin Orthop. 1997; 334: 383-384
        • Partington P.F.
        • Broome G.H.
        Diagnostic injection around the shoulder: Hit and miss? A cadaveric study of injection accuracy.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7: 147-150
        • Eustace J.A.
        • Brophy D.P.
        • Gibney R.P.
        • Bresnihan B.
        • FitzGerald O.
        Comparison of the accuracy of steroid placement with clinical outcome in patients with shoulder symptoms.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1997; 56: 59-63
        • Sethi P.M.
        • Kingston S.
        • El Attrache N.
        Accuracy of anterior intra-articular injection of the glenohumeral joint.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 77-80
        • Yamakado K.
        The targeting accuracy of subacromial injection to the shoulder.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 887-891