Advertisement
Original article| Volume 22, ISSUE 3, P329-338, March 2006

Tensioning of Remnant Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Reconstruction of Anterolateral Bundle in Chronic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

      Purpose: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries have potential for intrinsic healing and several magnetic resonance imaging studies have reported that the PCL healed with continuity but also with residual laxity. The goal of our study was to introduce a new method and investigate the outcome of tensioning of the remnant PCL and reconstruction of the anterolateral (AL) bundle of the PCL using modified inlay technique. Type of Study: Therapeutic study. Methods: Forty-nine patients who underwent tensioning of the remnant PCL and reconstruction of the AL bundle of the PCL were evaluated 45.7 months (range, 24 to 78 months) on average after surgery. Tensioning was performed by distal transfer of the tibial attachment. The AL bundle of the PCL was reconstructed with 4 bundles of hamstring tendon (34 cases), bone–patellar tendon–bone graft (7 cases), or Achilles tendon allograft (8 cases), arthroscopically at the femoral tunnel and by the modified inlay technique through a posteromedial approach in the supine position. In 35 patients who had a combined posterolateral rotatory instability, the posterolateral corner reconstruction was performed. Stability was assessed by stress radiographs with the Telos device and maximal manual testing with KT-1000 arthrometer. The clinical results were assessed by IKDC and OAK scores. Physical examination was performed using the posterior drawer test, varus stress test, posterolateral drawer test, and dial test in 30° and 90° flexion. Results: The average side-to-side difference of posterior tibial translation on posterior stress radiographs decreased from 10.4 ± 2.1 mm to 2.2 ± 1.0 mm. The average side-to-side difference in maximal manual test with the KT-1000 arthrometer also decreased from 8.2 ± 1.5 mm to 1.9 ± 1.0 mm. The final IKDC score was A in 10 (20.4%), B in 33 (67.3%), and C in 6 (12.2%) patients. The average OAK score improved from 63.3 ± 8.3 to 91 ± 7.3. Conclusions: Good clinical results and very good posterior stability were achieved with tensioning of the remnant PCL and reconstruction of the AL bundle using the modified inlay technique in chronic PCL injuries. With this technique, the surgeon can operate without changing the patient’s position during surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Oakes D.A.
        • Markolf K.L.
        • McWilliams J.
        • Young C.R.
        • McAllister D.R.
        The effect of femoral tunnel position on graft forces during inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 667-672
        • Berg E.E.
        Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 69-76
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Tae S.K.
        • Yum J.K.
        • Koo B.H.
        Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with two graft tendons by combined femoral dual tunnel and modified tibial inlay method.
        J Korean Knee Soc. 1998; 10: 119-124
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Jang E.C.
        • Yum J.K.
        Second look findings after arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        J Korean Knee Soc. 1997; 9: 35-42
        • Ahn J.H.
        • Chung Y.S.
        • Oh I.
        Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the posterior trans-septal portal.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 101-107
        • Clancy Jr, W.G.
        • Shelbourne K.D.
        • Zoellner G.B.
        • Keene J.S.
        • Reider B.
        • Rosenberg T.D.
        Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament.
        Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65: 310-322
        • Harner C.D.
        • Hoher J.
        Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.
        Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26: 471-482
        • Mariani P.P.
        • Adriani E.
        • Santori N.
        • Maresca G.
        Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone patellar graft.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997; 5: 239-244
        • Scapinelli R.
        Comment on W. Petersen and B. Tillmann, Blood and lymph supply of the posterior cruciate ligament.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7 (author reply 338): 337
        • Bray R.C.
        • Leonard C.A.
        • Salo P.T.
        Vascular physiology and long-term healing of partial ligament tears.
        J Orthop Res. 2002; 20: 984-989
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Tae S.K.
        • Yang D.Y.
        • Kim J.S.
        • Ko Kw.
        • Chung J.W.
        Healing potential of the transected posterior cruciate ligament of the rabbit.
        J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2001; 36: 25-31
        • Tewes D.P.
        • Fritts H.M.
        • Fields R.D.
        • Quick D.C.
        • Buss D.D.
        Chronically injured posterior cruciate ligament.
        Clin Orthop. 1997; : 224-232
        • Shelbourne K.D.
        • Jennings R.W.
        • Vahey T.N.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.
        Am J Knee Surg. 1999; 12: 209-213
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Tae S.K.
        • Yang D.Y.
        • Han J.N.
        • Song I.S.
        • Kang I.K.
        Magnetic resonance imaging on posterior cruciate ligament injury.
        J Korean Knee Soc. 2000; 12: 172-179
        • Janousek A.T.
        • Jones D.G.
        • Clatworthy M.
        • Higgins L.D.
        • Fu F.H.
        Posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint.
        Sports Med. 1999; 28: 429-441
        • Albright J.P.
        • Brown A.W.
        Management of chronic posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee.
        Instr Course Lect. 1998; 47: 369-378
        • Burks R.T.
        • Schaffer J.J.
        A simplified approach to the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament.
        Clin Orthop. 1990; : 216-219
        • Hughston J.C.
        • Jacobson K.E.
        Chronic posterolateral rotatory instability of the knee.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67: 351-359
        • Kim S.J.
        • Shin S.J.
        • Jeong J.H.
        Posterolateral rotatory instability treated by a modified biceps rerouting technique.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 493-499
        • Clancy Jr, W.G.
        • Shepard M.F.
        • Cain Jr, E.L.
        Posterior lateral corner reconstruction.
        Am J Orthop. 2003; 32: 171-176
        • Sidles J.A.
        • Larson R.V.
        • Garbini J.L.
        • Downey D.J.
        • Matsen III, F.A.
        Ligament length relationships in the moving knee.
        J Orthop Res. 1988; 6: 593-610
        • Fanelli G.C.
        • Larson R.V.
        Practical management of posterolateral instability of the knee.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 1-8
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Lee E.W.
        • Koo B.H.
        Reliability of the manual maximal displacement test and quadriceps active test with KT-1000 arthrometer in the assessment of posterior instability of the knee.
        J Korean Knee Soc. 1998; 10: 56-59
        • Muller W.
        • Biedert R.
        • Hefti F.
        • Jakob R.P.
        • Munzinger U.
        • Staubli H.U.
        OAK knee evaluation. A new way to assess knee ligament injuries.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1988; : 37-50
        • Hefti F.
        • Muller W.
        Current state of evaluation of knee ligament lesions. The new IKDC knee evaluation form.
        Orthopade. 1993; 22: 351-362
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Tae S.K.
        • Yum J.K.
        • Park K.H.
        Retension of chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury—Two case reports.
        J Korean Knee Soc. 1999; 11: 226-230
        • Berg E.E.
        Posterior cruciate ligament recession.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 644-647
        • Dejour H.
        • Walch G.
        • Peyrot J.
        • Eberhard P.
        The natural history of rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament.
        Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1988; 74: 35-43
        • Safran M.R.
        • Allen A.A.
        • Lephart S.M.
        • Borsa P.A.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Harner C.D.
        Proprioception in the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7: 310-317
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Tae S.K.
        • Jung H.J.
        • Lee K.H.
        Replacement of the torn posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A: 1878-1883
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Tae S.K.
        • Yum J.K.
        • Koo B.H.
        The results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—Transtibial two tunnel technique vs. modified tibial inlay technique.
        J Korean Arthrosc Soc. 1998; 2: 135-140
        • Jung Y.B.
        • Jung H.J.
        • Tae S.K.
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Lee K.H.
        Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 247-263
        • Harner C.D.
        • Vogrin T.M.
        • Hoher J.
        • Ma C.B.
        • Woo S.L.
        Biomechanical analysis of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Deficiency of the posterolateral structures as a cause of graft failure.
        Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 32-39
        • Miller M.D.
        • Johnson D.L.
        • Harner C.D.
        • Fu F.H.
        Posterior cruciate ligament injuries.
        Orthop Rev. 1993; 22: 1201-1210
        • Bergfeld J.A.
        • McAllister D.R.
        • Parker R.D.
        • Valdevit A.D.
        • Kambic H.E.
        A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.
        Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 129-136
        • Markolf K.L.
        • Zemanovic J.R.
        • McAllister D.R.
        Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 518-524
        • Ohkoshi Y.
        • Nagasaki S.
        • Yamamoto K.
        • et al.
        A new endoscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 258-263
        • Christel P.
        Basic principles for surgical reconstruction of the PCL in chronic posterior knee instability.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003; 11: 289-296
        • McAllister D.R.
        • Markolf K.L.
        • Oakes D.A.
        • Young C.R.
        • McWilliams J.
        A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques.
        Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 312-317
        • Miller M.D.
        • Kline A.J.
        • Gonzales J.
        • Beach W.R.
        Vascular risk associated with a posterior approach for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique.
        J Knee Surg. 2002; 15: 137-140