Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Capsular Release of the Elbow

      Purpose: Elbow contracture is a common and difficult problem to manage. The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcomes of arthroscopic capsular release in the management of elbow contractures. Methods: A total of 22 patients (14 males, 8 females; mean age, 42 years) undergoing arthroscopic contracture release were retrospectively reviewed at a minimum follow-up of 1 year (mean, 25 months). In all, 20 patients had a capsulectomy, and 2 underwent capsulotomy. Patient-rated questionnaires (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire [DASH], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Form [ASES-e], and Short Form-36 [SF-36]) and clinical, radiographic, and objective evaluations were used to assess outcomes. Motion and strength were measured by independent evaluators through standard goniometry and the LIDO Isokinetic System (Loredan Biomedical, West Sacramento, CA). Results: Mean flexion significantly improved from 122° ± 15° to 141° ± 12° (P < .001). Mean extension significantly improved from 38° ± 18° to 19° ± 13° (P < .001). Mean arc improvement was 38° ± 23° (P < .001). None of the patients had instability, and no major neurovascular complications were reported. All patients had improved elbow function with a mean ASES-e score of 31 out of 36. Most patients were satisfied with their surgery, experienced minimal pain, and exhibited minimal impairment on the DASH. Conclusions: Arthroscopic debridement and capsulectomy of the contracted elbow is effective. Results are comparable with those of other reports in the literature in which both arthroscopic and open methods were used. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • King G.J.W.
        • Faber K.J.
        Posttraumatic elbow stiffness.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2000; 31: 129-143
        • Morrey B.F.
        • Askew R.P.T.
        • An K.N.
        • et al.
        A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63: 872-876
        • Mansat P.
        • Morrey B.F.
        A limited lateral approach for extrinsic contracture of the elbow.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 1603-1615
        • Urbaniak J.R.
        • Hansen P.E.
        • Beissenger S.F.
        • Aitken M.S.
        Correction of post-traumatic flexion contracture of the elbow by anterior capsulotomy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67: 1160
        • Cohen M.S.
        • Hastings 2nd, H.
        Operative release for elbow contracture.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: 133-139
        • Savoie 3rd, F.H.
        • Jones G.S.
        Management of arthrofibrosis.
        in: Savoie F.H.3rd Field L.D. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Churchill Livingstone, Singapore1996: 129-144
        • Lynch G.J.
        • Meyers J.F.
        • Whipple T.L.
        • et al.
        Neurovascular anatomy and elbow arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 1986; 2: 191-197
        • Gallay S.H.
        • Richards R.R.
        • O’Driscoll S.W.
        Intra-articular capacity and compliance of stiff and normal elbows.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 9-13
        • Marshall P.D.
        • Fairclough J.A.
        • Johnson S.R.
        • Evans E.J.
        Avoiding nerve damage during elbow arthroscopy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 74: 129-131
        • Rupp S.
        • Tempelhof S.
        Arthroscopic surgery of the elbow.
        Clin Orthop. 1995; 313: 140-145
        • Kim S.J.
        • Shin S.J.
        Arthroscopic treatment for limitation of motion of the elbow.
        Clin Orthop. 2000; 375: 140-148
        • Jones G.S.
        • Savoie F.H.
        Arthroscopic capsular release of flexion contractures (arthrofibrosis) of the elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 277-283
        • Haapaniemi T.
        • Berggren M.
        • Adolfsson L.
        Complete transaction of the median and radial nerves during arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow contracture.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 784-787
        • Savoie F.H.
        • Nunley P.D.
        • Field L.D.
        Arthroscopic management of the arthritic elbow.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 214-219
        • Redden J.F.
        • Stanley D.
        Arthroscopic fenestration for osteoarthritis.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 14-16
        • Ogilvie-Harris D.J.
        • Gorton R.
        • MacKay M.
        Arthroscopic treatment for posterior impingement in degenerative arthritis of the elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 437-443
        • Ball C.M.
        • Meunier M.
        • Galatz L.M.
        • Calfee R.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        Arthroscopic treatment of post-traumatic elbow contracture.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11: 624-629
        • Timmermans L.A.
        • Andrews J.R.
        Arthroscopic treatment of posttraumatic elbow pain and stiffness.
        Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22: 230-235
        • Jones G.S.
        • Savoie F.H.
        Arthroscopic capsular release of flexion contractures (arthrofibrosis) of the elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 277-283
        • Philips B.B.
        • Strasburger S.
        Arthroscopic treatment of arthrofibrosis of the elbow joint.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 38-44
        • Nowicki K.D.
        • Shall L.M.
        Arthroscopic release of a posttraumatic flexion contracture in the elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1992; 8: 544-547
        • Amstrong A.D.
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Chinchalkar S.
        • Stevens R.S.
        • King G.J.
        Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7: 573-580
        • Hudak P.L.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Bombardier C.
        Development of an upper extremity outcome measure.
        Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 602-608
        • King G.J.
        • Richards R.R.
        • Zuckerman J.D.
        • et al.
        A standardized method for assessment of elbow function—Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 351-354
        • Patterson L.A.
        • Spivey W.E.
        Validity and reliability of the LIDO active isokinetic system.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992; 15: 32-36
        • Brown L.E.
        • Whitehurst M.
        • Bryan J.
        Reliability of the LIDO active isokinetic dynamometer concentric mode.
        Instr Res. 1992; 4: 191-194
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Alyafi T.
        • Richards R.S.
        Test-retest reliability of static endurance grip strength tests performed on the Jamar and NK.
        Physiother Can. 2001; 53: 48-54
        • MacDermid J.C.
        • Evenhuis W.
        • Louzon W.
        Inter-instrument reliability of pinch strength measures.
        J Hand Ther. 2001; 14: 36-42
        • Ware J.E.
        • Snow K.K.
        • Kosinski M.
        • Gandek B.
        SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. New England Medical Centre, The Health Institute, Boston1993
        • MacDermid J.C.
        Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology.
        J Hand Ther. 2001; 14: 105-114
        • Richards R.R.
        Releases, transpositions, and repairs about the elbow.
        in: Richards R.R. Soft tissue reconstruction in the upper extremity. Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY1995: 183-205
        • O’Driscoll S.W.
        Arthroscopic treatment for osteoarthritis of the elbow.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1995; 26: 691-706
      1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. DASH normative scoring documentation and scores. Available at: Accessed 2002.

        • Beaton D.E.
        • Katz J.N.
        • Fossel A.G.
        • Wright J.G.
        • Tarasuk V.
        • Bombardier C.
        Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure in different regions of the upper extremity.
        J Hand Ther. 2001; 14: 128-146
        • Gofton W.T.
        • King G.J.
        Heterotopic ossification following elbow arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: E2