Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 23, ISSUE 4, P400-404.e1, April 2007

Mechanical Properties of Patellar Tendon Allografts Subjected to Chemical Sterilization

      Purpose: We tested the hypothesis that the preimplantation mechanical properties of BioCleanse-treated bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) allografts are not significantly different from those of untreated specimens. Methods: For this controlled laboratory study, specimens were harvested as central third or hemi-BPTB units from both knees of 17 cadaveric tissue donors (11 men and 6 women) aged 19 to 88 years. Donor-matched specimens (20 per group) were randomly assigned to either BioCleanse-treated or untreated control groups. Specimens were subjected to 25 minutes of pretensioning at 89 N and then cyclically loaded under longitudinal tension between 50 N and 250 N for 1,000 cycles at 1 Hz, followed by ramp to failure at 50 mm/min. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between untreated and BioCleanse-treated specimens in stiffness (235.3 ± 37.6 N/mm v 222.3 ± 53.4 N/mm, P = .37), cyclic creep (0.38 ± 0.42 mm v 0.40 ± 0.26 mm, P = .81), maximum force (1,685.7 ± 471.6 N v 1,807.0 ± 657.8 N, P = .47), or ultimate stress (29.0 ± 9.8 MPa v 29.0 ± 12.8 MPa, P = .98). Conclusions: The preimplantation mechanical properties of BPTB allografts treated with BioCleanse are not significantly different from those of untreated controls. Clinical Relevance: This laboratory study compares the biomechanical properties of chemically treated allografts, which are currently being used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, with those of nontreated fresh-frozen allografts.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Harner C.D.
        • Olson E.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        • Silverstein S.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Silbey M.
        Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 3- to 5-year outcome.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 324: 134-144
        • Shelton W.R.
        • Papendick L.
        • Dukes A.D.
        Autograft versus allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 446-449
        • Peterson R.K.
        • Shelton W.R.
        • Bomboy A.L.
        Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 5-year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 9-13
        • Chang S.K.
        • Egami D.K.
        • Shaieb M.D.
        • Kan D.M.
        • Richardson A.B.
        Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Allograft versus autograft.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 453-462
        • Poehling G.G.
        • Curl W.W.
        • Lee C.A.
        • et al.
        Analysis of outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament repair with 5-year follow-up: Allograft versus autograft.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 774-785
        • Cole D.W.
        • Ginn T.A.
        • Chen G.J.
        • et al.
        Cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Autograft versus allograft.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 786-790
        • Shino K.
        • Kimura T.
        • Hirose H.
        • Inoue M.
        • Ono K.
        Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by allogeneic tendon graft: An operation for chronic ligamentous insufficiency.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986; 68: 739-746
        • Strickland S.M.
        • MacGillivray J.D.
        • Warren R.F.
        Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tendons.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2003; 34: 41-47
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Barber-Westin S.D.
        • Roberts C.S.
        Use of allografts after failed treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76: 1019-1031
        • Kainer M.A.
        • Linden J.V.
        • Whaley D.N.
        • et al.
        Clostridium infections associated with musculoskeletal-tissue allografts.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350 (erratum in: N Engl J Med 2004;351:397-398): 2564-2571
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Update: Allograft-associated bacterial infections—United States, 2002.
        JAMA. 2002; 287: 1642-1644
        • Patel R.
        • Trampuz A.
        Infections transmitted through musculoskeletal-tissue allografts.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2544-2546
        • Bechtold J.E.
        • Eastlund D.T.
        • Butts M.K.
        • Lagerborg D.F.
        • Kyle R.F.
        The effects of freeze-drying and ethylene oxide sterilization on the mechanical properties of human patellar tendon.
        Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22: 562-566
        • Jackson D.W.
        • Windler G.E.
        • Simon T.M.
        Intraarticular reaction associated with the use of freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized bone-patella tendon-bone allografts in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 1-10
        • Roberts T.S.
        • Drez Jr, D.
        • McCarthy W.
        • Paine R.
        Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized, bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts: Two year results in thirty-six patients.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19 (erratum in: Am J Sports Med 1991;19:272): 35-41
        • Vangsness Jr, C.T.
        • Triffon M.J.
        • Joyce M.J.
        • Moore T.M.
        Soft tissue for allograft reconstruction of the human knee: A survey of the American Association of Tissue Banks.
        Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 230-234
        • Fideler B.M.
        • Vangsness Jr, C.T.
        • Moore T.
        • Li Z.
        • Rasheed S.
        Effects of gamma irradiation on the human immunodeficiency virus.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76: 1032-1035
        • Pruss A.
        • Kao M.
        • Gohs U.
        • Koscielny J.
        • von Versen R.
        • Pauli G.
        Effect of gamma irradiation on human cortical bone transplants contaminated with enveloped and non-enveloped viruses.
        Biologicals. 2002; 30: 125-133
        • Rasmussen T.J.
        • Feder S.M.
        • Butler D.L.
        • Noyes F.R.
        The effects of 4 Mrad of gamma irradiation on the initial mechanical properties of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts.
        Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 188-197
        • Fideler B.M.
        • Vangsness Jr, C.T.
        • Lu B.
        • Orlando C.
        • Moore T.
        Gamma irradiation: Effects on biomechanical properties of human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.
        Am J Sports Med. 1995; 23: 643-646
        • Gibbons M.J.
        • Butler D.L.
        • Grood E.S.
        • Bylski-Austrow D.I.
        • Levy M.S.
        • Noyes F.R.
        Effects of gamma irradiation on the initial mechanical and material properties of goat bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.
        J Orthop Res. 1991; 9: 209-218
        • Salehpour A.
        • Butler D.L.
        • Proch F.S.
        • et al.
        Dose-dependent response of gamma irradiation on mechanical properties and related biochemical composition of goat bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.
        J Orthop Res. 1995; 13: 898-906
        • Curran A.R.
        • Adams D.J.
        • Gill J.L.
        • Steiner M.E.
        • Scheller A.D.
        The biomechanical effects of low-dose irradiation on bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 1131-1135
        • Mills C.R.
        • Roberts M.R.
        BioCleanse tissue processing system: Biological safety. Regeneration Technologies, Inc, Alachua (FL)2000 ([technical monograph], Mar 30 [cited 2006 May 15]. Available from: http://www.endoplus.nl/userpdf/BioCleanseTissueProcessingSystem.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2006)
        • Liang K.-Y.
        • Zeger S.L.
        Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.
        Biometrika. 1986; 73: 13-22
        • McCullagh P.
        • Nelder J.A.
        Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London1983
        • Stringham D.R.
        • Pelmas C.J.
        • Burks R.T.
        • Newman A.P.
        • Marcus R.L.
        Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using patellar tendon autograft or allograft.
        Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 414-421
        • Victor J.
        • Bellemans J.
        • Witvrouw E.
        • Govaers K.
        • Fabry G.
        Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Prospective analysis of patellar tendon autografts compared with allografts.
        Int Orthop. 1997; 21: 93-97
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Butler D.L.
        • Grood E.S.
        • Zernicke R.F.
        • Hefzy M.S.
        Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66: 344-352
        • Saddemi S.R.
        • Frogameni A.D.
        • Fenton P.J.
        • Hartman J.
        • Hartman W.
        Comparison of perioperative morbidity of anterior cruciate ligament autografts versus allografts.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 519-524
        • Jackson D.W.
        • Corsetti J.
        • Simon T.M.
        Biologic incorporation of allograft anterior cruciate ligament replacements.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 324: 126-133
        • Johnson G.A.
        • Tramaglini D.M.
        • Levine R.E.
        • Ohno K.
        • Choi N.Y.
        • Woo S.L.
        Tensile and viscoelastic properties of human patellar tendon.
        J Orthop Res. 1994; 12: 796-803
        • Flahiff C.M.
        • Brooks A.T.
        • Hollis J.M.
        • Vander Schilden J.L.
        • Nicholas R.W.
        Biomechanical analysis of patellar tendon allografts as a function of donor age.
        Am J Sports Med. 1995; 23: 354-358