Advertisement

Evidence of Validity for the Hip Outcome Score in Hip Arthroscopy

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide evidence of validity for the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) as an outcome instrument in hip arthroscopy. Methods: We mailed the short form 36 (SF-36) and HOS questionnaires, as well as questionnaires regarding self-reported current activity level (normal, nearly normal, abnormal, or severely abnormal) and self-reported surgical outcome (excellent/good or fair/poor), to 337 subjects. Medical records were used to collect surgical and demographic information. Two groups were formed for those above and below the median age. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the relation between the SF-36 scores and HOS scores. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether HOS scores differed according to current level of function, surgical outcome, and age. Results: Of the subjects, 116 (34%) returned the questionnaire material. Nine of these subjects reported having surgery after August 2003 and were excluded. The data analysis was therefore performed on 107 subjects (32%). Within this group, there were 56 female patients (52%) and 51 male patients (48%), with a mean age of 42 years (median, 44.2 years; range, 14 to 79 years; SD, 14) and mean time to follow-up of 3.1 years (range, 2 to 4.6 years; SD, 0.49). The HOS activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscales had a high correlation to the SF-36 physical function subscale (r = 0.86 and r = 0.84, respectively) and physical component summary score (r = 0.80 and r = 0.81, respectively) and a significantly (P < .005) lower correlation to the mental health subscale (r = 0.41 and r = 0.43, respectively) and mental component summary score (r = 0.17 and r = 0.18, respectively). HOS ADL and sports subscale scores were significantly different based on current activity level, surgical outcome, and age (P < .002). Conclusions: This study provides evidence of validity for the HOS in a sample of subjects at a mean of 3 years after hip arthroscopy. As hypothesized, the HOS scores had a high correlation to measures of physical function and a low correlation to measures of mental health. The HOS scores were different based on subjects’ reported current activity level, reported surgical outcome, and age. The results of this study support the use of the HOS ADL and sports subscales as a self-report outcome instrument for hip arthroscopy. Level of Evidence: Level III, development of diagnostic criteria in a study of nonconsecutive patients.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Byrd J.W.
        The role of hip arthroscopy in the athletic hip.
        Clin Sports Med. 2006; 25 (viii): 255-278
        • McCarthy J.C.
        • Lee J.
        Hip arthroscopy: Indications and technical pearls.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; : 180-187
        • Enseki K.R.
        • Martin R.L.
        • Draovitch P.
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Schenker M.L.
        The hip joint: Arthroscopic procedures and postoperative rehabilitation.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36: 516-523
        • Bellamy N.
        • Buchanan W.W.
        • Goldsmith C.H.
        • Campbell J.
        • Stitt L.W.
        Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
        J Rheumatol. 1988; 15: 1833-1840
        • Christensen C.P.
        • Althausen P.L.
        • Mittleman M.A.
        • Lee J.A.
        • McCarthy J.C.
        The nonarthritic hip score: Reliable and validated.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; : 75-83
        • D’Aubigne R.M.
        • Postel M.
        Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954; 36: 451-475
        • Hunsaker F.G.
        • Cioffi D.A.
        • Amadio P.C.
        • Wright J.G.
        • Caughlin B.
        The American academy of orthopaedic surgeons outcomes instruments: Normative values from the general population.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 208-215
        • Nilsdotter A.K.
        • Lohmander L.S.
        • Klassbo M.
        • Roos E.M.
        Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—Validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003; 4: 10
        • Tugwell P.
        • Bombardier C.
        • Buchanan W.W.
        • Goldsmith C.H.
        • Grace E.
        • Hanna B.
        The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire—An individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis.
        J Rheumatol. 1987; 14: 446-451
        • Wright J.G.
        • Young N.L.
        The patient-specific index: Asking patients what they want.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 974-983
        • Byrd J.W.
        • Jones K.S.
        Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 578-587
        • Harris W.H.
        Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51: 737-755
        • Martin R.L.
        Hip arthroscopy and outcome assessment.
        Oper Tech Orthop. 2005; 15: 290-296
        • Schenker M.L.
        • Martin R.L.
        • Weiland D.E.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Current trends in hip arthroscopy: A review of injury diagnosis, techniques and outcome scoring.
        Curr Opin Orthop. 2005; 16: 89-94
        • Martin R.L.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Evidence of validity for the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) based on differential item functioning.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36: A6-A7
        • Martin R.L.
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 1304-1311
        • Meng X.
        • Roenthal R.
        • Sax G.
        Comparing correlation coefficients.
        Psychol Bull. 1957; 111: 172-175
        • Whyte J.
        Toward a methodology for rehabilitation research.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 73: 428-435
        • Pantano K.J.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        • Burdett R.
        • Delitto A.
        • Harner C.
        • Fu F.H.
        A pilot study on the relationship between physical impairment and activity restriction in persons with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at long-term follow-up.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9: 369-378
        • Simmonds M.J.
        • Olson S.L.
        • Jones S.
        • et al.
        Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 2412-2421
        • Snyder-Mackler L.
        • Fitzgerald G.K.
        • Bartolozzi III, A.R.
        • Ciccotti M.G.
        The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury.
        Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 191-195
        • Pugia M.L.
        • Middel C.J.
        • Seward S.W.
        • et al.
        Comparison of acute swelling and function in subjects with lateral ankle injury.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001; 31: 384-388
        • Binkley J.M.
        • Stratford P.W.
        • Lott S.A.
        • Riddle D.L.
        The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application.
        Phys Ther. 1999; 79: 371-383
        • Potter B.K.
        • Freedman B.A.
        • Andersen R.C.
        • Bojescul J.A.
        • Kuklo T.R.
        • Murphy K.P.
        Correlation of Short Form-36 and disability status with outcomes of arthroscopic acetabular labral debridement.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 864-870