Acromioclavicular Joint Reoperation After Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression With and Without Concomitant Acromioclavicular Surgery

      Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the reoperation rate on the acromioclavicular (AC) joint after arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASAD) with and without concomitant AC joint surgery and to identify factors related to continued AC joint symptoms. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 1,482 cases without concomitant shoulder pathology that were followed up by physical examination, phone interview, questionnaire, or chart review. Group A, patients who underwent ASAD alone, consisted of 1,091 cases. Group B, patients who underwent ASAD with concomitant AC joint surgery consisting of either co-planing or arthroscopic distal clavicle resection (ADCR), consisted of 391 cases. Results: A total of 22 patients underwent reoperation on the AC joint. The overall reoperation rate was 1.5%, or 22 of 1,482 patients. The index procedure failed in 16 patients from the ASAD group (group A), yielding a reoperation rate of 1.5%. The index procedure failed in 6 patients from the group undergoing ASAD with concomitant AC joint surgery (group B), for a reoperation rate of 1.5%. Reoperation occurred at a mean of 22 months and 8 months for group A and group B, respectively. Overall, 17 of 22 patients (77%) who required AC joint reoperation were either Workers’ Compensation (WC) or litigation cases. The reoperation rate was 2.4% for WC patients and 0.8% for non-WC patients. WC status was found to be a statistically significant factor in the rate of reoperation for AC joint symptoms (P < .05). Of the 22 patients, 10 continued to have pain at a mean of 25.9 months (range, 9 to 53 months) after reoperation. Given the similar rates of reoperation, routine AC joint violation by co-planing or ADCR is not recommended during ASAD. Reoperation for continued AC joint symptoms was associated with a nearly 50% rate of continued symptoms. Conclusions: The results of the study show that the incidence of reoperation on the AC joint after ASAD with or without concomitant AC joint surgery is small for both groups with a 1.5% rate of reoperation for each group. The incidence of reoperation is lower, at 0.8%, for non-WC cases. In addition, there was a high rate of continued symptoms, with 45% of patients having continued pain after reoperation. Violation of the AC joint during the initial surgery by co-planing or ADCR did not alter the reoperation rate for AC joint symptoms. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Neer II, C.S.
        Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: A preliminary report.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 41-50
        • Ellman H.
        Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: Analysis of one- to three-year results.
        Arthroscopy. 1987; 3: 173-181
        • Sachs R.A.
        • Stone M.L.
        • Devine S.
        Open versus arthroscopic acromioplasty: A prospective, randomized study.
        Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 248-254
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Kimmel J.
        • McCann P.D.
        • Wolfe I.
        Repair of rotator cuff tears in tennis players.
        Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 112-117
        • Burns T.P.
        • Turba J.E.
        Arthroscopic treatment of shoulder impingement in athletes.
        Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 13-16
        • Caspari R.B.
        • Thal R.
        A technique for arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
        Arthroscopy. 1992; 8: 23-30
        • Fischer B.W.
        • Gross R.M.
        • McCarthy J.A.
        • Arroyo J.S.
        Incidence of acromioclavicular joint complications after arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 241-248
        • Paulos L.E.
        • Franklin J.L.
        Arthroscopic shoulder decompression development and application: A five year experience.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 235-244
      1. Roberts MR, Tasto JP, Hazel M. The effects of acromioclavicular joint stability after arthroscopic co-planing. Presented at Specialty Day, Shoulder and Elbow Society, San Francisco, CA, February 1997.

        • Ryu R.K.N.
        Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: A clinical review.
        Arthroscopy. 1992; 8: 141-147
        • Neviaser T.J.
        • Neviaser R.J.
        • Neviaser J.S.
        • Neviaser J.S.
        The four-in-one arthroplasty for the painful arc syndrome.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; : 107-112
      2. Stubbs MJ, Field LD, Savoie FH. The role of distal clavicle resection in the treatment of impingement syndrome. Presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, April 1999.

        • Deshmukh A.V.
        • Perlmutter G.S.
        • Zilberfarb J.L.
        • Wilson D.R.
        Effect of subacromial decompression on laxity of the acromioclavicular joint: Biomechanical testing in a cadaveric model.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13: 338-343
        • Kuster M.S.
        • Hales P.F.
        • Davis S.J.
        The effects of arthroscopic acromioplasty on the acromioclavicular joint.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7: 140-143
        • Debski R.E.
        • Fenwick J.A.
        • Vangura A.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Woo S.L.
        • Rodosky M.W.
        Effect of arthroscopic procedures on the acromioclavicular joint.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; : 89-96
        • Edwards S.G.
        Acromioclavicular stability: A biomechanical comparison of acromioplasty to acromioplasty with complaining of the distal clavicle.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 1079-1084
        • Buford D.
        • Mologne T.
        • McGrath S.
        • Heinen G.
        • Snyder S.
        Midterm results of arthroscopic co-planing of the acromioclavicular joint.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000; 9: 498-501
        • Patel V.R.
        • Singh D.
        • Calvert P.T.
        • Bayley J.I.L.
        Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: Results and factor affecting outcome.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 231-237
      3. Weber SC. Co-planing the AC joint at the time of acromioplasty: A long term study. Presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, April 1999.

        • Seltzer D.G.
        • Wirth M.A.
        • Rockwood C.A.
        Complications and failures of open and arthroscopic acromioplasties.
        Oper Tech Sports Med. 1994; 2: 136-151
        • Hawkins R.J.
        • Chris T.
        • Bokor D.
        • Kiefer G.
        Failed anterior acromioplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; : 106-111
        • Ogilvie-Harris D.J.
        • Wiley A.M.
        Failed acromioplasty for impingement syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72: 1070-1072
        • Hawkins R.J.
        • Saddemi S.R.
        • Mor J.T.
        Analysis of failed arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
        Arthroscopy. 1991; 7: 315-316
        • Martin S.D.
        • Baumgarten T.E.
        • Andrews J.R.
        Arthroscopic resection of the distal aspect of the clavicle with concomitant subacromial decompression.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 328-335