Advertisement

Risk and Outcome of Infection After Different Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

  • Mehmet S. Binnet
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mehmet S. Binnet, M.D., Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ibn-i Sina Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji ABD, Samanpazari 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kerem Başarir
    Affiliations
    Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
    Search for articles by this author
      Purpose: Infection after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is reported to be rare but can cause significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in infection rates between techniques and no difference in outcome of different techniques after treatment of this complication. Methods: From a consecutive case series of 1,231 patients who underwent ACL reconstructions with 3 different techniques from 1988 through 2006, we report 6 patients who developed postoperative infection. Time to presentation, clinical symptoms, patient demographics, and surgical and management details were obtained from patient charts. All 6 patients were re-examined with physical and radiographic evaluation, functional testing, KT-1000 (Medmetric, San Diego, CA), and Lysholm scales. Results: Six patients (0.49%) were identified including 2 infections for each technique with incidence of 0.86%, 0.29%, and 0.64%, respectively. The graft was retained in all 6 patients and treated with debridement and continuous antibiotics. Metallic implant was removed in 5 cases. Patients were followed up for an average of 102.5 months. The average modified Lysholm score was 81.1. The average maximum manual KT-1000 value was 2.7 mm. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis, and no significant differences were noted in incidence, mean Lysholm scores, or KT-1000 difference (P > .05). Conclusions: Aggressive surgical debridement, hardware removal, and appropriate antibiotic therapy have proven effective in eliminating postsurgical infection along with graft retention and preservation of knee stability after ACL reconstruction performed with 3 different techniques. Although it was a small case series, the incidence and outcome after treatment of ACL infection in our study is similar, supporting the hypothesis that treatment outcomes were similar by using different surgical methods. Level of Evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Scollin-Borg M.
        • Michaelsson K.
        • Rahme H.
        Presentation, outcome and cause of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A case control study.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 941-947
        • Vallianatos P.
        • Tilentzoglou A.
        • Koutsoukou A.
        Septic arthritis caused by Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae infection after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 16: E26
        • Hogan C.J.
        • Fang G.D.
        • Scheld W.M.
        • et al.
        Inhibiting the inflammatory response in joint sepsis.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 311-315
        • Kelly P.J.
        • Martin W.J.
        • Coventry M.B.
        Bacterial (suppurative) arthritis in the adult.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52: 1595-1602
        • McAllister D.
        • Parker R.
        • Cooper A.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of postoperative septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 562-570
        • Indelli P.
        • Dillingham M.
        • Fanton G.
        • et al.
        Septic arthritis in postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 398: 182-188
        • Matawa M.J.
        • Evans T.A.
        • Wright R.W.
        • Shively R.A.
        Septic arthritis of the knee following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Results of a survey of sports medicine fellowship directors.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 717-725
        • D’Angelo G.L.
        • Ogilvie-Harris D.J.
        Septic arthritis following arthroscopy with cost benefit analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis.
        Arthroscopy. 1988; 4: 10-14
        • Viola R.
        • Marzano N.
        • Vianello R.
        An unusual epidemic of staphylococcus negative infections involving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with salvage of the graft and function.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 173-177
        • Armstrong R.W.
        • Bolding F.
        Septic arthritis following arthroscopy: The contributing roles of intraarticular steroids and environmental factors.
        Am J Infect Control. 1994; 22: 16-18
        • Burks R.
        • Friederichs M.
        • Fink B.
        • et al.
        Treatment of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament infections with graft removal and early reimplantation.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 414-418
        • Binnet M.S.
        • Demirtaş M.
        Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon.
        Acta Orthop Traum Turc. 1990; 24: 369-375
        • Armstrong R.W.
        • Bolding F.
        • Joseph R.
        Septic arthritis following arthroscopy: Clinical syndromes and analysis of risk factors.
        Arthroscopy. 1992; 8: 213-223
        • Williams III, R.J.
        • Laurencin C.T.
        • Warren R.F.
        • et al.
        Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Diagnosis and management.
        Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 261-267
        • De Lee J.C.
        Chairman, Committee on complications of arthroscopy association of North America: Complications of arthroscopy and arthroscopic surgery: Results of a national survey.
        Arthroscopy. 1985; 1: 214-220
        • Ivey F.M.
        • Clark R.
        Arthroscopic debridement of the knee for adult septic arthritis.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; 199: 201-206
        • Blevins F.T.
        • Salgado J.
        • Wascher D.C.
        • Koster F.
        Septic arthritis following arthroscopic meniscus repair: A cluster of three cases.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 35-40
        • Montgomery S.C.
        • Campbell J.
        Septic arthritis following arthroscopy and intraarticular steroids.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989; 71: 540
        • Sherman O.H.
        • Fox J.M.
        • Snyder S.J.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopy: “No problem surgery.”.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68: 256-265
        • Smith R.L.
        • Schurman D.J.
        • Kajiyama B.A.
        • et al.
        The effect of antibiotics on the destruction of cartilage in experimental infectious arthritis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69: 1063-1068