Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 25, ISSUE 10, P1093-1100, October 2009

Rotator Cuff Integrity After Arthroscopic Repair for Large Tears With Less-Than-Optimal Footprint Coverage

      Purpose

      The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results and healing status of rotator cuff repairs with less than 50% footprint coverage.

      Methods

      During the 18-month period from October 2005 to March 2007, 89 large to massive rotator cuff tears were arthroscopically repaired. Among them, 23 consecutive large to massive rotator cuff tears were repaired completely but with less than 50% of the original footprint. All tears were arthroscopically repaired with suture anchors. Preoperative and postoperative clinical assessments were performed with the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and pain visual analog scale. The healing status of repaired tendon was evaluated by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with a focus on tendon integrity, muscle fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy.

      Results

      The mean follow-up period was 30.2 months (range, 24 to 41 months). At final follow-up visits, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and score on pain visual analog scale were found to have improved significantly from 40.1, 35.9, and 57.7 to 82.4, 86.6, and 12.3, respectively (P < .01). The overall retear rate was 45.5% (10 cases). However, clinical results showed no difference between the retear group and no retear group. Furthermore, rerupture size was smaller than original tear size in all 10 patients, and no significant progression of fatty degeneration or muscle atrophy of rotator cuff muscles was observed.

      Conclusions

      Less-than-optimal coverage of the original greater tuberosity footprint during arthroscopic repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears was found to be associated with a relatively high retear rate (45.5%). However, clinical results improved significantly, and no significant difference was observed in the clinical results between the retear and no retear groups.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, therapeutic case series.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Charousset C.
        • Grimberg J.
        • Duranthon L.D.
        • Bellaiche L.
        • Petrover D.
        • Kalra K.
        The time for functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Correlation with tendon healing controlled by computed tomography arthrography.
        Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 25-33
        • Gerber C.
        • Fuchs B.
        • Hodler J.
        The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 505-515
        • Thomazeau H.
        • Boukobza E.
        • Morcet N.
        • Chaperon J.
        • Langlais F.
        Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; : 275-283
        • Harryman II, D.T.
        • Mack L.A.
        • Wang K.Y.
        • Jackins S.E.
        • Richardson M.L.
        • Matsen III, F.A.
        Repairs of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73: 982-989
        • Sugaya H.
        • Maeda K.
        • Matsuki K.
        • Moriishi J.
        Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 953-960
        • Mellado J.M.
        • Calmet J.
        • Olona M.
        • et al.
        MR assessment of the repaired rotator cuff: Prevalence, size, location, and clinical relevance of tendon rerupture.
        Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 2186-2196
        • Post M.
        • Silver R.
        • Singh M.
        Rotator cuff tear.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; : 78-91
        • Yoo J.C.
        • Ahn J.H.
        • Yang J.H.
        • Koh K.H.
        • Choi S.H.
        • Yoon Y.C.
        Correlation of arthroscopic repairability of large to massive rotator cuff tears with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 573-582
        • Boileau P.
        • Brassart N.
        • Watkinson D.J.
        • Carles M.
        • Hatzidakis A.M.
        • Krishnan S.G.
        Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: Does the tendon really heal?.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1229-1240
        • Gazielly D.F.
        • Gleyze P.
        • Montagnon C.
        Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; : 43-53
        • Owen R.S.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Kneeland J.B.
        • Dalinka M.K.
        • Deren J.A.
        • Oleaga L.
        Shoulder after surgery: MR imaging with surgical validation.
        Radiology. 1993; 186: 443-447
        • Davidson J.F.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Richards D.P.
        • Campbell S.E.
        Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to predict rotator cuff tear pattern and method of repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 1428
        • Warner J.J.
        • Higgins L.
        • Parsons IM I.V.
        • Dowdy P.
        Diagnosis and treatment of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10: 37-46
        • Goutallier D.
        • Postel J.M.
        • Bernageau J.
        • Lavau L.
        • Voisin M.C.
        Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; : 78-83
        • Goutallier D.
        • Postel J.M.
        • Gleyze P.
        • Leguilloux P.
        • Van Driessche S.
        Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 550-554
        • Fuchs B.
        • Weishaupt D.
        • Zanetti M.
        • Hodler J.
        • Gerber C.
        Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: Assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 599-605
        • Fuchs B.
        • Gilbart M.K.
        • Hodler J.
        • Gerber C.
        Clinical and structural results of open repair of an isolated one-tendon tear of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 309-316
        • Warner J.J.
        • Parsons IM I.V.
        Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer: A comparative analysis of primary and salvage reconstruction of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10: 514-521
        • Mellado J.M.
        • Calmet J.
        • Olona M.
        • et al.
        Surgically repaired massive rotator cuff tears: MRI of tendon integrity, muscle fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy correlated with intraoperative and clinical findings.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 1456-1463
        • Agresti A.
        • Wiley J.
        Categorical data analysis.
        in: Wiley, New York1990: 467-476
        • Bland M.
        An introduction to medical statistics.
        in: Oxford University Press, Oxford2000: 144-147
        • Gerber C.
        • Schneeberger A.G.
        • Beck M.
        • Schlegel U.
        Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76: 371-380
        • Warner J.P.
        • Krushell R.J.
        • Masquelet A.
        • Gerber C.
        Anatomy and relationships of the suprascapular nerve: Anatomical constraints to mobilization of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles in the management of massive rotator-cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74: 36-45
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Diaz Pagan J.L.
        • Wirth M.A.
        • Athanasiou K.A.
        Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: Confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 720-724
        • Caniggia M.
        • Maniscalco P.
        • Pagliantini L.
        • Bocchi L.
        Titanium anchors for the repair of rotator cuff tears: Preliminary report of a surgical technique.
        J Orthop Trauma. 1995; 9: 312-317
        • Reed S.C.
        • Glossop N.
        • Ogilvie-Harris D.J.
        Full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
        Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 46-48
        • Rossouw D.J.
        • McElroy B.J.
        • Amis A.A.
        • Emery R.J.
        A biomechanical evaluation of suture anchors in repair of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79: 458-461
        • Apreleva M.
        • Ozbaydar M.
        • Fitzgibbons P.G.
        • Warner J.J.
        Rotator cuff tears: The effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 519-526
        • Curtis A.S.
        • Burbank K.M.
        • Tierney J.J.
        • Scheller A.D.
        • Curran A.R.
        The insertional footprint of the rotator cuff: An anatomic study.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22 (Available online at www.arthroscopyjournal.org): 603-609.e1
        • Mochizuki T.
        • Sugaya H.
        • Uomizu M.
        • et al.
        Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 962-969
        • Bishop J.
        • Klepps S.
        • Lo I.K.
        • Bird J.
        • Gladstone J.N.
        • Flatow E.L.
        Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: A prospective study.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15: 290-299
        • Klepps S.
        • Bishop J.
        • Lin J.
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of the effect of rotator cuff integrity on the outcome of open rotator cuff repairs.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 1716-1722