Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 25, ISSUE 12, P1391-1400, December 2009

Articular Cartilage Regeneration With Autologous Marrow Aspirate and Hyaluronic Acid: An Experimental Study in a Goat Model

Published:September 18, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.011

      Purpose

      The purpose of the study was to determine whether postoperative intra-articular injections of autologous marrow aspirate (MA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) after subchondral drilling resulted in better cartilage repair as assessed histologically by Gill scoring.

      Methods

      In a goat model we created a 4-mm full-thickness articular cartilage defect in the stifle joint (equivalent to 1.6 cm in the human knee) and conducted subchondral drilling. The animals were divided into 3 groups: group A (control), no injections; group B (HA), weekly injection of 1 mL of sodium hyaluronate for 3 weeks; and group C (HA + MA), similar to group B but with 2 mL of autologous MA in addition to HA. MA was obtained by bone marrow aspiration, centrifuged, and divided into aliquots for cryopreservation. Fifteen animals were equally divided between the groups and sacrificed 24 weeks after surgery, when the joint was harvested, examined macroscopically and histologically.

      Results

      Of the 15 animals, 2 from group A had died of non–surgery-related complications and 1 from group C was excluded because of a joint infection. In group A the repair constituted mainly scar tissue, whereas in group B there was less scar tissue, with small amounts of proteoglycan and type II collagen at the osteochondral junction. In contrast, repair cartilage from group C animals showed almost complete coverage of the defect with evidence of hyaline cartilage regeneration. Histology assessed by Gill scoring was significantly better in group C with 1-way analysis of variance yielding an F statistic of 10.611 with a P value of .004, which was highly significant.

      Conclusions

      Postoperative intra-articular injections of autologous MA in combination with HA after subchondral drilling resulted in better cartilage repair as assessed histologically by Gill scoring in a goat model.

      Clinical Relevance

      After arthroscopic subchondral drilling, this novel technique may result in better articular cartilage regeneration.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shapiro F.
        • Koide S.
        • Glimcher M.J.
        Cell origin and differentiation in the repair of full-thickness defects of articular cartilage.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 532-553
        • Mithoefer K.
        • Williams R.J.
        • Warren R.F.
        • et al.
        Chondral resurfacing of articular cartilage defects in the knee with the microfracture technique.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 294-304
        • Bae D.K.
        • Yoon K.H.
        • Song S.J.
        Cartilage healing after microfracture in osteoarthritic knees.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 367-374
        • LaPrade R.F.
        • Bursch L.S.
        • Olson E.J.
        • Havlas V.
        • Carlson C.S.
        Histologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of failed articular cartilage resurfacing procedures for osteochondritis of the knee: A case series.
        Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 360-368
        • Yan H.
        • Yu C.
        Repair of full-thickness cartilage defects with cells of different origin in a rabbit model.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 178-187
        • Goldberg V.M.
        • Buckwalter J.A.
        Hyaluronans in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: Evidence for disease-modifying activity.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005; 13: 216-224
        • Ghosh P.
        • Guidolin D.
        Potential mechanism of action of intra-articular hyaluronan therapy in osteoarthritis: Are the effects molecular weight dependent?.
        Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 32: 10-37
        • Kang S.W.
        • Bada L.P.
        • Kang C.S.
        • et al.
        Articular cartilage regeneration with microfracture and hyaluronic acid.
        Biotechnol Lett. 2008; 30: 435-439
        • Murphy J.M.
        • Fink D.J.
        • Hunziker E.B.
        • Barry F.P.
        Stem cell therapy in a caprine model of osteoarthritis.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48: 3464-3474
        • Gill T.J.
        • McCulloch P.C.
        • Glasson S.S.
        • Blanchet T.
        • Morris E.A.
        Chondral defect repair after the microfracture procedure: A nonhuman primate model.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 680-685
        • Faul F.
        • Erdfelder E.
        • Lang A.G.
        • Buchner A.
        G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
        Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
        in: Ed 2. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1988: 274-287
        • Lee K.B.
        • Hui J.H.
        • Song I.C.
        • Ardany L.
        • Lee E.H.
        Injectable mesenchymal stem cell therapy for large cartilage defects—A porcine model.
        Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 2964-2971
        • Woodfield T.B.
        • Bezemer J.M.
        • Pieper J.S.
        • van Blitterswijk C.A.
        • Riesle J.
        Scaffolds for tissue engineering of cartilage.
        Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2002; 12: 209-236
        • Lund T.C.
        • Tolar J.
        • Orchard P.J.
        Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized CFU-F can be found in the peripheral blood but have limited expansion potential.
        Haematologica. 2008; 93: 908-912
        • Bobis S.
        • Jarocha D.
        • Majka M.
        Mesenchymal stem cells: Characteristics and clinical applications.
        Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2006; 44: 215-230
      1. Hyalgan (sodium hyaluronate) [prescribing information]. Available from: http://products.sanofi-aventis.us/hyalgan/hyalgan.html. Accessed August 4, 2009.

        • Frisbie D.D.
        • Oxford J.T.
        • Southwood L.
        • et al.
        Early events in cartilage repair after subchondral bone microfracture.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 407: 215-227
        • Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee
        Cellular products for joint surface repair—Briefing document.
        in: Meeting 38. March 3-4, 2005 Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD2005
        • Rhee D.K.
        • Marcelino J.
        • Baker M.
        • et al.
        The secreted glycoprotein lubricin protects cartilage surfaces and inhibits synovial cell overgrowth.
        J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 622-631
        • Bittner K.
        • Vischer P.
        • Bartholmes P.
        • Bruckner P.
        Role of the subchondral vascular system in endochondral ossification: Endothelial cells specifically derepress late differentiation in resting chondrocytes in vitro.
        Exp Cell Res. 1998; 238: 491-497
        • O'Driscoll S.W.
        • Keeley F.W.
        • Salter R.B.
        The chondrogenic potential of free autogenous periosteal grafts for biological resurfacing of major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68: 1017-1035
        • Pineda S.
        • Pollack A.
        • Stevenson S.
        • Goldberg V.
        • Caplan A.
        A semiquantitative scale for histologic grading of articular cartilage repair.
        Acta Anat (Basel). 1992; 143: 335-340