Advertisement

The German Hip Outcome Score: Validation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement

Published:November 12, 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.07.021

      Purpose

      To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) for use in German-speaking patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.

      Methods

      After cross-cultural adaptation (German-language version of the HOS [HOS-D]), the following metric properties of the questionnaire were assessed in 85 consecutive patients (mean age, 33.4 years; 36 women) undergoing hip arthroscopy or surgical hip dislocation: feasibility, reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity (correlation with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Oxford Hip Score, Short Form 12, and University of California, Los Angeles activity scale). We calculated floor and ceiling effects taking the minimal detectable change into account.

      Results

      The activities of daily living subscale of the HOS-D could be scored in all cases and the sport subscale in all but one. The HOS-D scores were highly reproducible with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.94 for the activities of daily living subscale and 0.89 for the sport subscale. Internal consistency was confirmed by Cronbach α values >0.90 for both subscales. Correlation coefficients with the other measures ranged from −0.08 (Mental Component Scale of Short Form 12) to −0.90 (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index function subscale).

      Conclusions

      The HOS-D is a reliable and valid self-assessment tool for patients undergoing surgical femoroacetabular impingement treatment. By use of the HOS, comparisons between studies and treatment regimens involving either German- or English-speaking patients are now possible.

      Level of Evidence

      Level I, testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria in a series of consecutive patients with universally applied gold standard.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Martin R.L.
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 1304-1311
        • Martin R.L.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score in hip arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 822-826
        • Martin R.L.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score.
        Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 676-682
        • Thorborg K.
        • Roos E.M.
        • Bartels E.M.
        • Petersen J.
        • Hölmich P.
        Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: A systematic review.
        Br J Sports Med. 2010 Aug 10; ([Epub ahead of print.])
        • Leunig M.
        • Beaulé P.E.
        • Ganz R.
        The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: Current status and future perspectives.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 616-622
        • Sierra R.J.
        • Trousdale R.T.
        • Ganz R.
        • Leunig M.
        Hip disease in the young, active patient: Evaluation and nonarthroplasty surgical options.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 689-703
        • Ganz R.
        • Leunig M.
        • Leunig-Ganz K.
        • Harris W.H.
        The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: An integrated mechanical concept.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 264-272
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Bombardier C.
        • Guillemin F.
        • Ferraz M.B.
        Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25: 3186-3191
        • Naal F.D.
        • Impellizzeri F.M.
        • Huber M.
        • Rippstein P.F.
        Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index for use in German-speaking patients with foot complaints.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29: 1222-1228
        • Naal F.D.
        • Impellizzeri F.M.
        • Sieverding M.
        • et al.
        The 12-item Oxford Knee Score: Cross-cultural adaptation into German and assessment of its psychometric properties in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17: 49-52
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Bot S.D.
        • de Boer M.R.
        • et al.
        Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 34-42
        • de Vet H.C.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Knol D.L.
        • Bouter L.M.
        When to use agreement versus reliability measures.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59: 1033-1039
        • Walter S.D.
        • Eliasziw M.
        • Donner A.
        Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.
        Stat Med. 1998; 17: 101-110
        • Cronbach L.J.
        Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
        Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297-334
        • Stucki G.
        • Meier D.
        • Stucki S.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Arthrosis Index.
        Z Rheumatol. 1996; 55: 40-49
        • Naal F.D.
        • Sieverding M.
        • Impellizzeri F.M.
        • von Knoch F.
        • Mannion A.F.
        • Leunig M.
        Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford hip score.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 952-957
        • Gandek B.
        • Ware J.E.
        • Aaronson N.K.
        • et al.
        Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA Project.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51: 1171-1178
        • Naal F.D.
        • Impellizzeri F.M.
        • Leunig M.
        Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467: 958-965
        • Mannion A.F.
        • Junge A.
        • Fairbank J.C.
        • Dvorak J.
        • Grob D.
        Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index.
        Eur Spine J. 2006; 15: 55-65
        • Clohisy J.C.
        • St John L.C.
        • Schutz A.L.
        Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review of the literature.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 555-564