Advertisement
Systematic Review| Volume 29, ISSUE 3, P566-574, March 2013

Improved Outcomes With Combined Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Patellofemoral Osteotomy Versus Isolated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

  • Thai Q. Trinh
    Affiliations
    The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center and Cartilage Restoration Program and Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joshua D. Harris
    Affiliations
    The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center and Cartilage Restoration Program and Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robert A. Siston
    Affiliations
    The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center and Cartilage Restoration Program and Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
  • David C. Flanigan
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to David C. Flanigan, M.D., The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center and Cartilage Restoration Program, 2050 Kenny Rd, Ste 3100, Columbus, OH 43221, U.S.A.
    Affiliations
    The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center and Cartilage Restoration Program and Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 10, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.008

      Purpose

      To compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing isolated patellofemoral autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and ACI combined with patellofemoral realignment.

      Methods

      A systematic review was performed by use of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines/checklist. We searched PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), SportDiscus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 1946 through February 2012 to determine whether a difference exists in outcomes of combined ACI and osteotomy versus isolated ACI (minimum 2 years' follow-up). Studies were included only if outcomes were reported separately for both isolated ACI and combined ACI and osteotomy. All ACI generations were eligible for inclusion. Patellofemoral osteotomies eligible for inclusion were anteriorization, medialization, or anteromedialization. All patient-, limb-, and defect-specific characteristics were assessed. All reported clinical scores, radiographic and histologic outcomes, and complications/reoperations were analyzed. Risk of bias was assessed within all studies.

      Results

      Eleven studies (10 Level III or IV evidence) (366 subjects) were included. Of the defects treated, 78% were located on the patella and 22% on the trochlea. The mean subject age was 33.3 years. Twenty-three percent of subjects underwent concomitant osteotomy. The mean length of follow-up was 4.2 years. Significant (P < .05) improvements in patients undergoing both isolated ACI and combined ACI and osteotomy for patellofemoral chondral defects were observed in all studies. Three studies directly compared isolated ACI and combined ACI and osteotomy, with significantly (P < .05) greater improvements shown in patients undergoing combined osteotomy and ACI (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner score, modified Cincinnati score, Short Form 12 score, and Short Form 36 score). There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of postoperative complications overall.

      Conclusions

      This review showed statistically significant improvements in patients undergoing both isolated ACI and ACI combined with osteotomy for patellofemoral chondral defects in all studies. When individual studies compared these 2 groups (3 studies), significantly greater improvements in multiple clinical outcomes in subjects undergoing ACI combined with osteotomy were observed. There was no significant difference in the rate of total complications between groups.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, systematic review of studies with minimum Level IV evidence, retrospective case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brittberg M.
        • Tallheden T.
        • Sjogren-Jansson B.
        • Lindahl A.
        • Peterson L.
        Autologous chondrocytes used for articular cartilage repair: An update.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; : S337-S348
        • Petersen L.
        • Brittberg M.
        • Lindahl A.
        Autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the ankle.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2003; 8: 291-303
        • Peterson L.
        • Vasiliadis H.S.
        • Brittberg M.
        • Lindahl A.
        Autologous chondrocyte implantation: A long-term follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 1117-1124
        • Brittberg M.
        • Lindahl A.
        • Nilsson A.
        • Ohlsson C.
        • Isaksson O.
        • Peterson L.
        Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation.
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 889-895
        • Minas T.
        • Bryant T.
        The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the patellofemoral joint.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; : 30-39
        • Niemeyer P.
        • Pestka J.M.
        • Kreuz P.C.
        • et al.
        Characteristic complications after autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects of the knee joint.
        Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 2091-2099
        • Fitzgerald J.B.
        • Jin M.
        • Grodzinsky A.J.
        Shear and compression differentially regulate clusters of functionally related temporal transcription patterns in cartilage tissue.
        J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 24095-24103
        • Grodzinsky A.J.
        • Levenston M.E.
        • Jin M.
        • Frank E.H.
        Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces.
        Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000; 2: 691-713
        • Torzilli P.A.
        • Deng X.H.
        • Ramcharan M.
        Effect of compressive strain on cell viability in statically loaded articular cartilage.
        Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2006; 5: 123-132
        • Farr J.
        Autologous chondrocyte implantation improves patellofemoral cartilage treatment outcomes.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 463: 187-194
        • Gigante A.
        • Enea D.
        • Greco F.
        • et al.
        Distal realignment and patellar autologous chondrocyte implantation: Mid-term results in a selected population.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17: 2-10
        • Trillat A.
        • Dejour H.
        • Couette A.
        Diagnosis and treatment of recurrent dislocations of the patella.
        Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1964; 50 (in French): 813-824
        • Maquet P.
        Advancement of the tibial tuberosity.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; : 225-230
        • Fulkerson J.P.
        • Becker G.J.
        • Meaney J.A.
        • Miranda M.
        • Folcik M.A.
        Anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer without bone graft.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18 (discussion 496-497): 490-496
        • Gobbi A.
        • Kon E.
        • Berruto M.
        • Francisco R.
        • Filardo G.
        • Marcacci M.
        Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with Hyalograft-C: A clinical, arthroscopic, and histologic review.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1763-1773
        • Henderson I.J.
        • Lavigne P.
        Periosteal autologous chondrocyte implantation for patellar chondral defect in patients with normal and abnormal patellar tracking.
        Knee. 2006; 13: 274-279
        • Obremskey W.T.
        • Pappas N.
        • Attallah-Wasif E.
        • Tornetta III, P.
        • Bhandari M.
        Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 2632-2638
        • Amin A.A.
        • Bartlett W.
        • Gooding C.R.
        • et al.
        The use of autologous chondrocyte implantation following and combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Int Orthop. 2006; 30: 48-53
        • Gobbi A.
        • Kon E.
        • Berruto M.
        • et al.
        Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: Results at 5 years' follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 1083-1092
        • Kreuz P.C.
        • Steinwachs M.
        • Erggelet C.
        • et al.
        Importance of sports in cartilage regeneration after autologous chondrocyte implantation: A prospective study with a 3-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1261-1268
        • Macmull S.
        • Jaiswal P.K.
        • Bentley G.
        • Skinner J.A.
        • Carrington R.W.
        • Briggs T.W.
        The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of symptomatic chondromalacia patellae.
        Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 1371-1377
        • Niemeyer P.
        • Steinwachs M.
        • Erggelet C.
        • et al.
        Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects: Clinical results referred to defect localisation.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008; 128: 1223-1231
        • Pascual-Garrido C.
        • Slabaugh M.A.
        • L'Heureux D.R.
        • Friel N.A.
        • Cole B.J.
        Recommendations and treatment outcomes for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects with autologous chondrocyte implantation: Prospective evaluation at average 4-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 33S-41S
        • Tohyama H.
        • Yasuda K.
        • Minami A.
        • et al.
        Atelocollagen-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation for the repair of chondral defects of the knee: A prospective multicenter clinical trial in Japan.
        J Orthop Sci. 2009; 14: 579-588
        • Vasiliadis H.S.
        • Lindahl A.
        • Georgoulis A.D.
        • Peterson L.
        Malalignment and cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 452-457
        • Pidoriano A.J.
        • Weinstein R.N.
        • Buuck D.A.
        • Fulkerson J.P.
        Correlation of patellar articular lesions with results from anteromedial tibial tubercle transfer.
        Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 533-537
        • Peterson L.
        • Brittberg M.
        • Kiviranta I.
        • Akerlund E.L.
        • Lindahl A.
        Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability.
        Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 2-12
        • Farr II, J.
        Autologous chondrocyte implantation and anteromedialization in the treatment of patellofemoral chondrosis.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2008; 39 (vi): 329-335
        • Feller J.A.
        • Amis A.A.
        • Andrish J.T.
        • Arendt E.A.
        • Erasmus P.J.
        • Powers C.M.
        Surgical biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 542-553
        • Beck P.R.
        • Thomas A.L.
        • Farr J.
        • Lewis P.B.
        • Cole B.J.
        Trochlear contact pressures after anteromedialization of the tibial tubercle.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 1710-1715
        • Harris J.D.
        • Siston R.A.
        • Pan X.
        • Flanigan D.C.
        Autologous chondrocyte implantation: A systematic review.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 2220-2233
        • Harris J.D.
        • Siston R.A.
        • Brophy R.H.
        • Lattermann C.
        • Carey J.L.
        • Flanigan D.C.
        Failures, re-operations, and complications after autologous chondrocyte implantation—A systematic review.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19: 779-791