Randomized Controlled Trial of Osteoconductive Fixation Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of the Calaxo and Milagro Screws


      To compare the outcome of 2 bioabsorbable screws for tibial interference fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with reference to rate of absorption, osteoconductive properties, and clinical outcome.


      Patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft in a single unit were invited to participate in this study. Patients were randomized to receive either the Calaxo screw (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) or Milagro screw (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA) for tibial fixation. Patients were reviewed with subjective and objective evaluation by use of the International Knee Documentation Committee form, Lysholm score, KT-1000 arthrometry (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), and clinical examination. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 1 year and computed tomography scanning at 1 week and at 6, 12, and 24 months.


      Sixty patients agreed to participate in the study, with 32 patients randomized to the Calaxo screw and 28 to the Milagro screw for tibial fixation. There was no significant difference in subjective or objective clinical outcome between the 2 groups. At 24 months, 88% of Calaxo screws showed complete screw resorption compared with 0% of Milagro screws (P < .001). Tibial cysts were present in 88% of the Calaxo group and 7% of the Milagro group (P = .001). At 24 months, the mean volume of new bone formation for the Calaxo group was 21% of original screw volume. Ossification of the Milagro screw was unable to be accurately assessed as a result of incomplete screw resorption.


      Both screws showed similar favorable objective and subjective outcomes at 2 years. The Calaxo screw resorbed completely over a period of 6 months and was associated with a high incidence of intra-tunnel cyst formation. The Milagro screw increased in volume over a period of 6 months, followed by a gradual resorption, which was still ongoing at 2 years. Both screws were associated with tunnel widening, and neither showed evidence of significant tunnel ossification. We conclude that, despite satisfactory clinical outcomes, the addition of “osteoconductive” materials to bioabsorbable screws is not associated with bone formation at the screw site at 2 years.

      Level of Evidence

      Level I, randomized controlled trial.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Zantop T.
        • Weimann A.
        • Schmidtko R.
        • Herbort M.
        • Raschke M.
        • Petersen W.
        Graft laceration and pullout strength of soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: In vitro study comparing titanium, poly-D, L-lactide, and poly-D, L-lactide tricalcium phosphate screws.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 1204-1210
        • Bowers M.
        • Tung G.
        • Trinh N.
        • et al.
        Effects of ACL interference screws on articular cartilage volume and thickness measurements with 1.5 T and 3 T MRI.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 16: 572-578
        • Kaeding C.
        • Farr J.
        • Kavanaugh T.
        • Pedroza A.
        A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 147-151
        • Ma C.B.
        • Francis K.
        • Towers J.
        • Irrgang J.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Harner C.H.
        Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and EndoButton-post fixation.
        Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 122-128
        • McGuire D.A.
        • Barber F.A.
        • Elrod B.F.
        • Paulos L.E.
        Bioabsorbable interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 463-473
        • Warden W.H.
        • Friedman R.
        • Teresi L.M.
        • Jackson D.W.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of bioabsorbable polylactic acid interference screws during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 474-480
        • Morgan C.D.
        • Gehrmann R.M.
        • Jayo M.J.
        • Johnson C.S.
        Histologic findings with a bioabsorbable anterior cruciate ligament interference screw explant after 2.5 years in vivo.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: E47
        • Lajtai G.
        • Humer K.
        • Aitzetmuller G.
        • Unger F.
        • Noszian I.
        • Orthner E.
        Serial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of a bioabsorbable interference screw and the adjacent bone.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 481-488
        • Shors E.C.
        Coralline bone graft substitutes.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30: 599-613
        • Walsh W.R.
        • Cotton N.J.
        • Stephens P.
        • et al.
        Comparison of poly-L-lactide and polylactide carbonate interference screws in an ovine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23 (765.e1-765.e2): 757-765
      1. Poandl T, Trenka-Benthin S, Azri-Meehan S, et al. A new faster degrading biocomposite material: Long-term in-vivo tissue reaction and absorption. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Vancouver, Canada, 2005.

        • Bourke H.
        • Gordon D.
        • Salmon L.
        • Waller A.
        • Linklater J.
        • Pinczewski L.
        The outcome at 15 years of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft for ‘isolated’ anterior cruciate ligament rupture.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94: 630-637
        • Saito T.
        • Toriwaki J.
        Reverse distance transformation and skeletons based upon the Euclidean metric for n-dimensional digital binary pictures.
        IEICE Trans Inf Syst. 1994; E77: 1005-1016
        • Storey T.F.
        • Montgomery W.J.
        • Bush C.H.
        • Moser M.
        Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Calaxo screws.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40: 229-232
        • Konan S.
        • Haddad F.S.
        A clinical review of bioabsorbable interference screws and their adverse effects in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.
        Knee. 2009; 16: 6-13
        • Cox C.L.
        • Homlar K.C.
        • Carey J.L.
        • Spindler K.P.
        CALAXO osteoconductive interference screw: The value of postmarket surveillance.
        J Surg Orthop Adv. 2010; 19: 121-124
        • Foldager C.
        • Jakobsen B.W.
        • Lund B.
        • et al.
        Tibial tunnel widening after bioresorbable poly-lactide calcium carbonate interference screw usage in ACL reconstruction.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 79-84
      2. Cooper JJ, Mackie AT. In vitro evaluation of a range of bioabsorbable composite interference screws designed for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA, February 2008.

        • Frosch K.H.
        • Sawallich T.
        • Schutze G.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the bioabsorbable Milagro interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2009; 4: 73-79
        • Barber F.A.
        • Dockery W.D.
        • Hrnack S.A.
        Long-term degradation of a poly-lactide co-glycolide/beta-tricalcium phosphate biocomposite interference screw.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 637-643