Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 29, ISSUE 4, P716-725, April 2013

Download started.

Ok

Adverse Outcomes Associated With Elective Knee Arthroscopy: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Published:February 08, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.020

      Purpose

      The aims of this study were to quantify the frequency of adverse outcomes after elective knee arthroscopies in Victoria, Australia, and to identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes.

      Methods

      We performed a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of elective orthopaedic admissions using the Victorian Admitted Episodes database, a routinely collected public and private hospital episodes database linked to death registry data, from July 1, 2000, to June 30, 2009. Adverse outcome measures included pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), hemarthrosis, effusion and synovitis, cellulitis, wound infection, synovial fistula, acute renal failure, myocardial infarct, stroke, and death. Patients were excluded if they had an additional procedure performed during the arthroscopy admission. We identified complications during the admission and within readmissions up to 30 days after the procedure. PE, DVT, and death within 90 days of the arthroscopy episode were also examined. We used logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors associated with complications.

      Results

      After we excluded 16,807 patients (8.5%) with an additional procedure during their admission, there were 180,717 episodes involving an elective arthroscopy during the period studied. The most common adverse outcomes within 30 days were DVT (579, 0.32%), effusion and synovitis (154, 0.09%), PE (147, 0.08%), and hemarthrosis (134, 0.07%). The 30-day orthopaedic readmission rate was 0.77%, and there were 55 deaths (0.03%). Within 90 days of arthroscopy, we identified 655 events of DVT (0.36%) and 179 PE events (0.10%). Logistic regression analysis identified that potential risk factors for complications were older age, presence of comorbidity, being married, major mechanical issues, and having the procedure performed in a public hospital.

      Conclusions

      Our study found 6.4 adverse outcomes per 1,000 elective knee arthroscopy procedures (0.64%), with the 3 most common complications being DVT, effusion and synovitis, and PE. We have also identified risk factors for adverse outcomes, particularly chronic kidney disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and cancer.

      Level of Evidence

      Level III, retrospective cohort study.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Allum R.
        Complications of arthroscopy of the knee.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 937-945
        • Hetsroni I.
        • Lyman S.
        • Do H.
        • et al.
        Symptomatic pulmonary embolism after outpatient arthroscopic procedures of the knee: The incidence and risk factors in 418,323 arthroscopies.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93: 47-51
        • Maletis G.B.
        • Inacio M.C.
        • Reynolds S.
        • et al.
        Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective knee arthroscopy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 714-720
        • Jameson S.S.
        • Dowen D.
        • James P.
        • et al.
        The burden of arthroscopy of the knee: A contemporary analysis of data from the English NHS.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93: 1327-1333
        • Victorian Department of Human Services Acute Health Division
        The Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset: An overview.
        Victorian Department of Human Services Acute Health Division, Melbourne2001
        • Henderson T.
        • Shepheard J.
        • Sundararajan V.
        Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data.
        Med Care. 2006; 44: 1011-1019
        • Quan H.
        • Sundararajan V.
        • Halfon P.
        • et al.
        Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
        Med Care. 2005; 43: 1130-1139
        • Zhang J.X.
        • Iwashyna T.J.
        • Christakis N.A.
        The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims.
        Med Care. 1999; 37: 1128-1139
        • Australian Bureau of Statistics
        Technical paper census of population and housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Area's (SEIFA), Australia, 2001.
        Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra2004
        • Falck-Ytter Y.
        • Francis C.W.
        • Johanson N.A.
        • et al.
        Prevention of VTE in orthopaedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.
        Chest. 2012; 141: e278S-e325S
        • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
        NICE clinical guideline 49. Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in inpatients undergoing surgery.
        National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London2010
        • National Health and Medical Research Council
        Clinical practice guideline for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) in patients admitted to Australian hospitals.
        National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne2009
        • Ramos J.
        • Perrotta C.
        • Badariotti G.
        • et al.
        Interventions for preventing venous thromboembolism in adults undergoing knee arthroscopy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; : CD005259
        • Camporese G.
        • Bernardi E.
        • Prandoni P.
        • et al.
        Low-molecular-weight heparin versus compression stockings for thromboprophylaxis after knee arthroscopy: A randomized trial.
        Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149: 73-82
        • Wattanakit K.
        • Cushman M.
        Chronic kidney disease and venous thromboembolism: Epidemiology and mechanisms.
        Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009; 15: 408-412
        • Khorana A.A.
        Cancer and thrombosis: Implications of published guidelines for clinical practice.
        Ann Oncol. 2009; 20: 1619-1630
        • Katz J.N.
        • Losina E.
        • Barrett J.
        • et al.
        Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 1622-1629
        • Jain N.
        • Pietrobon R.
        • Hocker S.
        • et al.
        The relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 496-505
        • Duckett S.J.
        • Jackson T.J.
        The new health insurance rebate: An inefficient way of assisting public hospitals.
        Med J Aust. 2000; 172: 439-442
        • Moseley J.B.
        • O'Malley K.
        • Petersen N.J.
        • et al.
        A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 81-88
        • Kirkley A.
        • Birmingham T.B.
        • Litchfield R.B.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1097-1107
        • Preen D.B.
        • Holman C.D.
        • Spilsbury K.
        • Semmens J.B.
        • Brameld K.J.
        Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 59: 940-946